2014
DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v6.i2.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A systematic review of literature

Abstract: Although many studies have focused on the preoperative risk factors of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery (CAL), postoperative delay in diagnosis is common and harmful. This review provides a systematic overview of all available literature on diagnostic tools used for CAL. A systematic search of literature was undertaken using Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Web-of-Science libraries. Articles were selected when a diagnostic or prediction tool for CAL was described and tested. Two reviewers separately a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
69
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
69
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Our review shows that CT with Gastrografin provided the most reliable differential diagnosis between POI and mechanical obstruction (LOE: 1c) [25]. Our previous systematic review regarding the detection of anastomotic leakage also demonstrated it to be a reliable diagnostic tool [41], which may assist the differential diagnosis between POI and septic ileus, due to anastomotic leakage by radiological manifestations such as the existence of extraluminal contrast, perianastomotic air, and fluid collections in the CT scan as adjuvants to the clinical manifestations and laboratory tests [42,43]. These integrated results suggest that CT scan should be recommended when suspicion is aroused.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our review shows that CT with Gastrografin provided the most reliable differential diagnosis between POI and mechanical obstruction (LOE: 1c) [25]. Our previous systematic review regarding the detection of anastomotic leakage also demonstrated it to be a reliable diagnostic tool [41], which may assist the differential diagnosis between POI and septic ileus, due to anastomotic leakage by radiological manifestations such as the existence of extraluminal contrast, perianastomotic air, and fluid collections in the CT scan as adjuvants to the clinical manifestations and laboratory tests [42,43]. These integrated results suggest that CT scan should be recommended when suspicion is aroused.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous abdominal surgery has been shown to be a risk factor for conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing colorectal resection, but it did not seem to increase the risk of an anastomotic leakage [19] . Early diagnosis of these complications potentially minimizes the inflammatory tissue reactions thereby facilitating repair and healing [20] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously mentioned, the most challenging part of pTaTME is to ligate IMV and mobilize proximal colon and MSF. Moreover, methods adopted to prevent disastrous anastomotic leak (AL) such as protective stoma [32] and air leak test [33] are inconvenient to perform. Consequently, it raises concerns about increased Als in pTaTME cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%