2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction and characterization of cyclic proteins from sequences in three domains of life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These have the disadvantage that there is no straightforward statistical approach available to determine likely false discovery rates, but are very valuable in prioritizing a list of peptides for further experimental characterization. Other computational approaches focus more on particular classes of antimicrobial peptides with a strong therapeutic potential, including ribosomal and non-ribosomal cyclic peptides (Prieto et al, 2012; Kedarisetti et al, 2014). While their computational screening methods have the benefit that they focus more strongly on peptides in classes of known therapeutic benefit, we believe that the computational screening approach we identified here complements their approaches, and widens the diversity of peptides for experimental investigation and validation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have the disadvantage that there is no straightforward statistical approach available to determine likely false discovery rates, but are very valuable in prioritizing a list of peptides for further experimental characterization. Other computational approaches focus more on particular classes of antimicrobial peptides with a strong therapeutic potential, including ribosomal and non-ribosomal cyclic peptides (Prieto et al, 2012; Kedarisetti et al, 2014). While their computational screening methods have the benefit that they focus more strongly on peptides in classes of known therapeutic benefit, we believe that the computational screening approach we identified here complements their approaches, and widens the diversity of peptides for experimental investigation and validation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discovery of knottins via sequence similarity has produced an extensive and well-organized database, despite a scope limited to sequence similarity [ 25 ]. Cypred [ 43 ] is another relevant software that can predict cyclic proteins and a significant subset of these cyclic peptides have STP like connectivity. While there is no known software to predict non-knotted STPs, there are databases focusing on limited specific families, such as CyBase for cyclotides [ 44 , 45 ], Conoserver for conotoxins [ 46 ] and Arachnoserver for spider toxins [ 47 ], but these have little broad application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logic-based machine learning has been used previously to classify the 2D structure of α/α domain type proteins [ 48 ], protein-protein interactions [ 49 ] or functional classifications of proteins from primary sequence. In particular, Support Vector Machines (SVM), a robust class of machine learning approaches [ 50 ], have been successfully used to predict cyclic proteins [ 43 ], 2D and 3D protein structures [ 51 , 52 ] and subcellular localization [ 53 ] from primary sequence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, generating effective features from protein sequences continues to require enormous manual intervention, and automated approaches have narrowly scoped structure prediction. Chemical property-based feature generation algorithms and dipeptide or tripeptide motif-specific approaches (Chaudhary et al, 2016;Kedarisetti et al, 2014) account for the the majority of these feature generation methods. In particular, Pseudo Amino Acid Composition (PseAAC) has been the most frequently used approach to classify proteins per their functional properties (Xiao et al, 2013;Mohabatkar et al, 2013), subfamilies (Chou, 2005), interactions with other proteins (Jia et al, 2015) and subcellular localizations (Lin et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%