2000
DOI: 10.2307/3435059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction and Assessment of the Effects of Mixtures of Four Xenoestrogens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
61
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the quantification of responses, however, one should be extra cautious for the presence of partial and/or superagonistic estrogens. This study confirms the suitability of CA to describe the effects of mixtures of similar acting xeno-estrogens in reporter gene assays as reported earlier (3,12,17,18).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the quantification of responses, however, one should be extra cautious for the presence of partial and/or superagonistic estrogens. This study confirms the suitability of CA to describe the effects of mixtures of similar acting xeno-estrogens in reporter gene assays as reported earlier (3,12,17,18).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Partial agonists only partially fulfill this requirement and thus cause the mixture curves to deviate from that of E2 at higher concentrations. The difficulty of predicting maximum effect levels of mixtures containing partial agonists with the CA model is also discussed by others (3,11). In our experiments, MILs of mixtures containing partial agonists could, however, roughly be estimated by calculation of the average MIL of the mixture components, weighted by their relative contributions to the total estrogenic activity of the mixture (last column in Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When dealing with agents that exhibit sigmoidal concentration-response curves, as is the case with estrogenic chemicals, it is not possible to calculate expected additive effects by forming the arithmetic sum of individual responses (effect summation; ES). Although the pitfalls of this approach have been discussed extensively (Berenbaum 1985;Kortenkamp and Altenburger 1998;Payne et al 2000), its shortcomings are not widely acknowledged. For this reason, we have included ES here for purposes of comparison.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To meet these requirements, we used the yeast estrogen screen (YES) (Routledge and Sumpter 1996), which has proven to yield highly reproducible results (Payne et al 2000;Rajapakse et al 2001). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%