2021
DOI: 10.3390/genes12020210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prediction Accuracies of Genomic Selection for Nine Commercially Important Traits in the Portuguese Oyster (Crassostrea angulata) Using DArT-Seq Technology

Abstract: Genomic selection has been widely used in terrestrial animals but has had limited application in aquaculture due to relatively high genotyping costs. Genomic information has an important role in improving the prediction accuracy of breeding values, especially for traits that are difficult or expensive to measure. The purposes of this study were to (i) further evaluate the use of genomic information to improve prediction accuracies of breeding values from, (ii) compare different prediction methods (BayesA, Baye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a major impediment to widely using genomic selection in the aquaculture industry is the cost of genotyping and phenotyping the selection candidates. The former can be dealt with by using low-density SNP panels that can balance between prediction accuracy and sequencing costs to achieve the accuracy needed for genomic selection (Lillehammer et al, 2013;Gutierrez et al, 2018;Tsairidou et al, 2020;Boudry et al, 2021;Vu et al, 2021a).…”
Section: Does Population Stratification Affect the Results Of This Study?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a major impediment to widely using genomic selection in the aquaculture industry is the cost of genotyping and phenotyping the selection candidates. The former can be dealt with by using low-density SNP panels that can balance between prediction accuracy and sequencing costs to achieve the accuracy needed for genomic selection (Lillehammer et al, 2013;Gutierrez et al, 2018;Tsairidou et al, 2020;Boudry et al, 2021;Vu et al, 2021a).…”
Section: Does Population Stratification Affect the Results Of This Study?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SNP development and analysis were as described by Kilian et al (2012) . Briefly, DNA samples were digested with Pst I– Sph I ( Kilian et al, 2012 ; Vu et al, 2021a ) and then ligated using two different adaptors with two different restriction enzyme overhangs. The Pst I-compatible adapter consists of Illumina’s flow-cell attachment, a sequencing primer, and a “staggered” varying-length barcode region ( Elshire et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of SNP density on predicted accuracies has been studied thoroughly for a wide variety of traits and species in aquaculture ( Yoshida et al, 2019 ; Kriaridou et al, 2020 ; Tsairidou et al, 2020 ; Al-Tobasei et al, 2021 ; Vu et al, 2021 ). The results of these studies highlight the potential to significantly reduce SNP density without affecting the accuracy of prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other cases, selected genotypes outperform in certain conditions, but become poor performers when exposed to a different set of conditionsthat is re-ranking of genotypes (Langdon et al 2003;D egremont et al 2005;Evans & Langdon 2006;Wang et al 2013). In marine bivalves, between-family variance described for traits such as growth, survival and environmental resilience (D egremont et al 2005;D egremont et al 2015a;Scanes et al 2020) indicates the genetic basis of traits associated with performance (Vu et al 2021). The re-ranking of genotypes, in turn, highlights the intrinsic effect of GxE on overall performance of a family or cohort.…”
Section: Genotype By Environment Responses To the Growout Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%