2020
DOI: 10.3390/f11020183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Tree Height-Diameter Relationship from Relative Competition Levels Using Quantile Regression Models for Chinese Fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) in Fujian Province, China

Abstract: The importance of the height-diameter (H-D) relationship in forest productivity is well known. The general nonlinear regression model, based on the mean regression technical, is not able to give a complete description of the H-D relationship. This study aims to evaluate the H-D relationship among relative competition levels and develop a quantile regression (QR) model to fully describe the H-D relationship. The dominance index was applied to determine the relative competition levels of trees for the Chinese fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(65 reference statements)
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, the increasing rate between height and DBH in the medium density always remained constant throughout the four ages. These results concur with those from a recent study where changes of height-DBH relationship were found among different competitions that were derived from stand density (Zhang et al 2020). However, the height-DBH relationship among different densities needs to be tested in more regions to further confirm the response of regression coefficients to the variation of densities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…At the same time, the increasing rate between height and DBH in the medium density always remained constant throughout the four ages. These results concur with those from a recent study where changes of height-DBH relationship were found among different competitions that were derived from stand density (Zhang et al 2020). However, the height-DBH relationship among different densities needs to be tested in more regions to further confirm the response of regression coefficients to the variation of densities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In this study, the developed models are nondeterministic models that consider both the symmetric and asymmetric diffusions of stem diameter at a particular height [21]. Multiple regression models that describe stem tapers have been proposed, traditionally incorporating the diameter at breast height and tree height as the independent variables [14][15][16][17][18][19] or using additional independent variables such as the density [18], crown ratio [33], and many more [34,35]. The newly developed SDE models are affected by the probability density function of the relative diameter, which changes among the relative heights.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the illustration plan, three stems from the complete dataset, corresponding to large, medium, and small trees were selected. Quantile regression is a method used to estimate the full conditional distribution of dependent variables [35,38]. Information about the distribution of diameters at any specified height is useful, for example, in understanding tree diameter dynamics against the tree height for the prediction of stem abnormality and for production management.…”
Section: Mean and Quantile Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To achieve reliable predictions of tree height, European forest statisticians have applied different techniques, such as generalized height-diameter models that include additional stand variables [8]. A generalized height equation evaluates the contribution of stand attributes, such as the stand density per hectare, the basal area per hectare, the quadratic mean diameter, and others in height-diameter models [9,10]. The inclusion of stand variables improves the predictive capacity of the selected height-diameter equation, but this technique requires additional sampling effort and reduces its practical application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%