2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevfluids.2.123501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting transition ranges to fully turbulent viscous boundary layers in low Prandtl number convection flows

Abstract: We discuss two aspects of turbulent Rayleigh-Bénard convection (RBC) on the basis of highresolution direct numerical simulations in a unique setting; a closed cylindrical cell of aspect ratio of one. First, we present a comprehensive comparison of statistical quantities such as energy dissipation rates and boundary layer thickness scales. Data are used from three simulation run series at Prandtl numbers P r that cover two orders of magnitude. In contrast to most previous studies in RBC the focus of the present… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

32
98
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(104 reference statements)
32
98
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The data is plotted over Ra in figure 8 and we find Nu (0.12 ± 0.04)Ra 0.27±0.02 . It agrees excellently with measurements by Cioni et al [10] in mercury (Pr = 0.025) and matches the numerical results by Scheel and Schumacher [27] of Nu (0.13 ± 0.04)Ra 0.27±0.01 for Pr = 0.021 with only a small shift. The results by Takeshita et al [9] in mercury (Pr = 0.024) agree with respect to the scaling exponent, but give a somewhat higher Nusselt number magnitude with Nu 0.155Ra 0.27±0.02 .…”
Section: A Heat Transportsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The data is plotted over Ra in figure 8 and we find Nu (0.12 ± 0.04)Ra 0.27±0.02 . It agrees excellently with measurements by Cioni et al [10] in mercury (Pr = 0.025) and matches the numerical results by Scheel and Schumacher [27] of Nu (0.13 ± 0.04)Ra 0.27±0.01 for Pr = 0.021 with only a small shift. The results by Takeshita et al [9] in mercury (Pr = 0.024) agree with respect to the scaling exponent, but give a somewhat higher Nusselt number magnitude with Nu 0.155Ra 0.27±0.02 .…”
Section: A Heat Transportsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The scaling exponent of Re centre (Ra) agrees very well with the result of DNS by Scheel and Schumacher [27] (open circles in figure 9(a)). In the numerical simulations, the Reynolds number was calculated from the rms-velocity over the whole cell for Pr = 0.021 and gave a scaling of Re (6.5 ± 0.6)Ra 0.45±0.01 .…”
Section: B Momentum Transportsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…merical simulation results obtained in a cylindrical RB cell filled with liquid mercury or liquid gallium2,12,40,41 , where Nu ∝ Ra 0.25∼0.27 , while the momentum scaling exponent from the present two-dimensional simulation is larger than that in previous three-dimensional simulations12,41 , where Re ∝ Ra 0.44∼0 45. .…”
contrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Rather, the goal was to have convection cells over as wide as an area possible for the thermal imaging to yield significant temperature statistics, both temporally and spatially. The criteria was then for a large diameter to thickness ratio of the apparatus (225 mm / 7 mm) that yielded a stable convection cell pattern at least or greater than 150 mm in diameter and stable for as long as the power is applied [64][65][66] . To the best of our knowledge, this has not been done before.…”
Section: Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%