Predicting Torsade de Pointes in Acquired Long QT Syndrome: Optimal Identification of Critical QT Interval Prolongation

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the optimal method of ventricular repolarization assessment in predicting torsade de pointes (Tdp) in acquired long QT syndrome (LQTS) within the context of the recommended cutoff levels of concern for QT/corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation. Methods: Twenty-nine patients with LQTS and Tdp (age 66 ± 11 years) and matched controls were studied. Standard 12-lead electrocardiograms were utilized to evaluate ventricular repolarization by using six different QT/JT heart rate correction methods. We compared the distribution of QT/QTc and JT/corrected JT intervals of patients who experienced Tdp with (1) the corresponding intervals in the matched controls and (2) the recommended cutoff levels for QT/JT interval prolongation. Results: Patients with Tdp (23 with narrow QRS, 6 with wide QRS) had longer ventricular repolarization intervals than controls (p < 0.001). For patients with narrow QRS, the QTc interval as determined firstly by the method of Hodges (t = 7.56, c = 0.933, p < 0.001), followed by the Nomogram and Fridericia methods, best discriminated Tdp patients from controls and provided the optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity at all three cutoff levels. For patients with wide QRS, the JT interval or, alternatively, the Hodges method seemed most useful. Conclusions: Assessment of ventricular repolarization by the Hodges, Nomogram and Fridericia methods performs best in identifying subsequent Tdp.

Incidence, Diagnosis, and Management of QT Prolongation Induced by Cancer Therapies: A Systematic Review

“…When an intraventricular conduction delay, left bundle branch block, right bundle branch block, or paced rhythm (usually adopting left bundle branch block–like morphological features) is present, a modified QT interval can be calculated by subtracting 48.5% of the duration of the QRS from the measured QT ($\text{mQT}=\text{QT}-0.485\mathrm{x}\left(\text{QRS}\right)$) and then correcting it for HR with conventional formulas or by taking a QTc of >550 ms as abnormal without any substraction 186. Subtracting the QRS duration from the QT measurement (ie, calculating the so‐called JT interval) and using a cutoff of >360 ms is an alternative to the modified QT interval calculation 187. Most ECG machines automatically report a QT interval by calculating the time between the earliest QRS onset of all leads and the latest offset of the T wave.…”

Update to Practice Standards for Electrocardiographic Monitoring in Hospital Settings: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

“…Numer ous alternatives, including the Hodges, Framingham, Fridericia, and subjectspecific formulas, have been shown to be more accurate. [88][89][90][91] Although there is cur rently a lack of consensus on a single optimal formula, some of these alternatives may be used more frequent ly in the future.…”

Plutselig, uventet epilepsirelatert død

“…Anfallsrelatert hypoventilasjon er også assosiert med økt risiko for kardial arytmi og kan dermed bidra til plutselig, uventet død (24). I tillegg kan elektrolyttforstyrrelser medføre forlenget QT-tid og dermed øke risikoen for fatal hjertearytmi (25). Cerebral hypoperfusjon sekundaert til bradykardi eller asystoli kan forverre tilstanden ytterligere.…”