2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Thermodynamic Properties of PBXTHs with New Quantum Topological Indexes

Abstract: Novel group quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models on the thermodynamic properties of PBXTHs were presented, by the multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis method. Four thermodynamic properties were studied: the entropy (Sθ), the standard enthalpy of formation (ΔfHθ), the standard Gibbs energy of formation (ΔfGθ), and the relative standard Gibbs energy of formation (ΔRGθ). The results by the formula indicate that the calculated and predicted data in this study are in good agreement with t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, a wealth of procedures to predict this quantity have been reported, covering a wide spectrum from simple additivity schemes to high-level composite ab initio methods . Between these two ends, other prominent approaches include quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) methodologies, molecular mechanics (MM) force fields, semiempirical quantum-chemical methods (SQM), procedures based on Hartree–Fock (HF) or density functional theory (DFT) combined with empirical corrections or isodesmic/isodesmotic reaction schemes, , and a variety of alternative hybrid procedures. As shown in Figure , these approaches can be loosely classified on the rungs of a Jacob’s ladder according to their computational requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, a wealth of procedures to predict this quantity have been reported, covering a wide spectrum from simple additivity schemes to high-level composite ab initio methods . Between these two ends, other prominent approaches include quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) methodologies, molecular mechanics (MM) force fields, semiempirical quantum-chemical methods (SQM), procedures based on Hartree–Fock (HF) or density functional theory (DFT) combined with empirical corrections or isodesmic/isodesmotic reaction schemes, , and a variety of alternative hybrid procedures. As shown in Figure , these approaches can be loosely classified on the rungs of a Jacob’s ladder according to their computational requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%