2018
DOI: 10.1111/cns.12851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting therapeutic response to fingolimod treatment in multiple sclerosis patients

Abstract: The results support that immune-monitoring of lymphocyte subpopulations in peripheral blood is a promising tool to select RRMS candidate for fingolimod treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, we could not prove an increased incidence of infectious adverse events in the lower vs. higher-level lymphopenia group. These data are in line with several studies presenting primarily mild to moderate infections during fingolimod ( 8 , 18 , 28 ) The most relevant infectious complication in fingolimod treated patients is defined by varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection or reactivation ( 8 , 18 , 33 ). However, individual variation of VZV specific T cell responses are assumed to be more relevant for upcoming VZV activation rather than absolute lymphocyte counts ( 34 , 35 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Nevertheless, we could not prove an increased incidence of infectious adverse events in the lower vs. higher-level lymphopenia group. These data are in line with several studies presenting primarily mild to moderate infections during fingolimod ( 8 , 18 , 28 ) The most relevant infectious complication in fingolimod treated patients is defined by varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection or reactivation ( 8 , 18 , 33 ). However, individual variation of VZV specific T cell responses are assumed to be more relevant for upcoming VZV activation rather than absolute lymphocyte counts ( 34 , 35 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In a previous report, pretreatment differences were found between the responder and NR patients in the transitional B and RTE cells ( 34 , 35 ). Our study differed from those results probably due to differences in patient selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Cell markers used to define each leukocyte subpopulations are specified in Table S1. The gating strategy used is based on an international consensus and was previously described by Teniente‐Serra and Quirant‐Sánchez …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leukocyte subpopulations were analyzed by using the following four panels of monoclonal antibodies, previously reported by Quirant‐Sánchez et al: (a) T‐cell panel: CD3‐V450, CD4‐PerCP‐Cy5.5, CD45RA‐PE‐Cy7, CCR7‐PE, CD38‐APC, CD8‐APC‐H7, HLA‐DR‐V500 (BD Biosciences), CXCR3‐AF488, CCR6‐BV605, and CD45‐AF700 (BioLegend); (b) Treg panel: CD4‐PerCP‐Cy5.5, CD25‐PE, CCR4‐PE‐Cy7, CD127‐AF647, CD45RO‐APC‐H7, CD3‐V450, HLA‐DR‐V500 (BD Biosciences), and CD45‐AF700 (BioLegend); (c) B‐cell panel: CD24‐FITC, CD19‐PerCP‐Cy5.5, CD38‐APC, CD20‐APC‐H7, CD3‐V500 (BD Biosciences), IgD‐PE‐Cy7, CD27‐BV421, and CD45‐AF700 (BioLegend); and (d) DC/monocyte/NK panel: CD3 + CD19‐APC‐H7, CD56‐PE, CD16‐APC, CD14‐V450, CD123‐PerCP‐Cy5.5, CD11c‐PE‐Cy7, HLA‐DR‐V500 (BD Biosciences), and slan‐FITC (Miltenyi Biotec).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%