2019
DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2019.1614702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the tensile strength and elongation at break of PP/graphene/glass fiber/EPDM nanocomposites using response surface methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At higher wt% of graphene nanosheets, a decrease in tensile strength is observed due to the agglomeration of nanosheets in the compounds. 23,28 These results are also seen in the FE-SEM image in Figure 6. Adding of PP-g-MA has increased the tensile strength.…”
Section: Results Of Graphene Nanosheets Pp-g-ma and Kenaf Fiber Combination Affecting Tensile Strengthsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At higher wt% of graphene nanosheets, a decrease in tensile strength is observed due to the agglomeration of nanosheets in the compounds. 23,28 These results are also seen in the FE-SEM image in Figure 6. Adding of PP-g-MA has increased the tensile strength.…”
Section: Results Of Graphene Nanosheets Pp-g-ma and Kenaf Fiber Combination Affecting Tensile Strengthsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…At higher wt% of graphene nanosheets, a decrease in flexural strength is observed due to the agglomeration of nanosheets in the compounds. 23,28 These results are also seen in the FE-SEM image in Figure 6. The addition of 5 wt% PP-g-MA has resulted in the formation of suitable bonds and increased adhesion between the fibers and nanaoparticles with the matrix, which ultimately increases the flexural strength of the compounds.…”
Section: Results Of Graphene Nanosheets Pp-g-ma and Kenaf Fiber Combination Affecting Flexural Strengthsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In this method, the physical properties of systems are predicated by the mathematical models, 2D and 3D diagrams between input variables, and output responses. [15] With the consideration of various conditions (linear, two-factor interaction [2FI], and quadratic), the mathematical models used in this method can be written as follows (Equations 1-3):…”
Section: Response Surface Methodology)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this method, the physical properties of systems are predicated by the mathematical models, 2D and 3D diagrams between input variables, and output responses. [ 15 ] With the consideration of various conditions (linear, two‐factor interaction [2FI], and quadratic), the mathematical models used in this method can be written as follows (Equations ): ygoodbreak=β0goodbreak+i=1kβixigoodbreak+ε0.25em ygoodbreak=β0goodbreak+i=1kβixigoodbreak+i=1ijkβijxixjgoodbreak+ε0.25em ygoodbreak=β0goodbreak+i=1kβixigoodbreak+i=1kβiixi2goodbreak+i=1ijkβijxixjgoodbreak+ε0.25em In these equations, y is the response of the system,0.25emxi and xj are input variables, βi, βii, and βij are the regression coefficients, β0 is the constant parameter, ε is the error matrix, and k is the number of variables. [ 16,17 ] In this paper, numerical optimization was performed using Design Expert 7.1.5 software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have a wide application in industry due to their ability to stretch, to moderate elongation and return to their near original shape, excellent thermal, mechanical, and chemical resistances [3,4]. In recent years, a lot of articles reported on mechanical properties and fracture mechanisms of TPE blends [5][6][7]. The fracture toughness of PA6/NBR/Hallosite nanotube (HNTs) nanocomposite was investigated by Paran et al [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%