2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10389-016-0742-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the survival of graft following liver transplantation using a nonlinear model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…True Negative (TN) and False Negative (FN) [9,10,11,12]. By using these parameters we calculated the performance measures like sensitivity, speci city and accuracy of the three proposed models [9,10,11,12].…”
Section: A Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…True Negative (TN) and False Negative (FN) [9,10,11,12]. By using these parameters we calculated the performance measures like sensitivity, speci city and accuracy of the three proposed models [9,10,11,12].…”
Section: A Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the multi-organ data, we have selected the pancreas data for the proposed research which is in Table 1 2 shows that the multilayer perceptron model consists of an information layer which gets the input, output layer produces the predicted information and the yielded layer which approximating the values from the information layer. As the number of shrouded layers increase, the most accurate predicted output will be obtained from the output layer [9,10,11]. Multilayer perceptron regularly associated to govern the learning problems by training the input information, match the information and display the connection between the sources of information and yielded layers.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By considering the square root of the relative squared error, we can reduce the fallacy of the identical measurements as the predicted consignment [18]. We can determine these measures by considering the AUC [19].…”
Section: Performance Error Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%