2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the stability of hard rock pillars using multinomial logistic regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With the accumulation of pillar stability cases, it provides researchers the opportunity to develop advanced predictive models using ML algorithms. Tawadrous and Katsabanis [22] used the artificial neural networks (ANN) to analyze the stability of surface crown pillars; Wattimena [23] introduced the multinomial logistic regression (MLR) for pillar stability prediction; Ding et al [24] adopted a stochastic gradient boosting (SGB) model to predict pillar stability, and found that this model achieved a better performance than the random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and multilayer perceptron neural networks (MPNN); Ghasemi et al [25] utilized J48 algorithm and SVM to develop two pillar stability graphs, and obtained acceptable prediction accuracy; and Zhou et al [9] compared the prediction performance of pillar stability using six supervised learning methods, and revealed that SVM and RF performed better. Although these ML algorithms can solve pillar stability prediction issues to some extent, none can be applied to all engineering conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the accumulation of pillar stability cases, it provides researchers the opportunity to develop advanced predictive models using ML algorithms. Tawadrous and Katsabanis [22] used the artificial neural networks (ANN) to analyze the stability of surface crown pillars; Wattimena [23] introduced the multinomial logistic regression (MLR) for pillar stability prediction; Ding et al [24] adopted a stochastic gradient boosting (SGB) model to predict pillar stability, and found that this model achieved a better performance than the random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and multilayer perceptron neural networks (MPNN); Ghasemi et al [25] utilized J48 algorithm and SVM to develop two pillar stability graphs, and obtained acceptable prediction accuracy; and Zhou et al [9] compared the prediction performance of pillar stability using six supervised learning methods, and revealed that SVM and RF performed better. Although these ML algorithms can solve pillar stability prediction issues to some extent, none can be applied to all engineering conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data rockburst tersebut selanjutnya dievaluasi dengan metode regresi logistik yang lebih sederhana dibandingkan dengan kelima metode di atas. Regresi ini telah digunakan untuk memprediksi caveability massa batuan (Mawdesley et al, 2001) maupun kemantapan pilar pada tambang bawah tanah (Wattimena et al, 2013;Wattimena, 2014). Regresi ini dipilih mengingat variable tak-bebas (tingkat rockburst) pada dataset hanya mempunyai empat nilai yang mungkin yaitu 0 (tidak ada rockburst), 1 (rockburst ringan), 2 (rockburst sedang), dan 3 (rockburst berat).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…to calculate and interpret the effect of an independent variable; it is good to take exponential of both sides of the equation to get predicted probabilities (Wattimena 2014).…”
Section: B Multinomial Logistic Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%