2013
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2013.787501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the spatial pattern of trees by airborne laser scanning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is no evidence that the spatial pattern of the trees could be correctly classified based on remotely sensed data [20]. Even if such a classification were useful for forestry applications, departures from the assumptions could cause severe error trends [82].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, there is no evidence that the spatial pattern of the trees could be correctly classified based on remotely sensed data [20]. Even if such a classification were useful for forestry applications, departures from the assumptions could cause severe error trends [82].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [19], a threshold of 5 m was used to assign all CHM values above that height as tree patches. In [20], an adaptive difference between the maximum height (h max ) and the standard deviation of the height values (h std ) was reported as the best canopy threshold for determining the spatial pattern of trees. Both the aforementioned constant and adaptive thresholds were tested in this study, and the patch features described in Table 3 were extracted from the thresholded CHMs.…”
Section: Patch Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to depicting solely canopy geometry, certain simplifications to the visualizing other elements were adopted. The number or the spatial pattern of the tree stems could not be precisely modeled, which is a typical result of ALS-based analyses (e.g., Packalén et al 2013). However, the landscape-level visualizations were found to be more realistic with at least some shadowing caused by the stems.…”
Section: Visualizing the Landscape And Harvests Of Canopy Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All trees with either diameter at breast height (DBH) ≥ 4 cm or height ≥ 4 m were mapped for locations and measured for species, DBH, and height. The measurements are described in more detail by Packalén et al (2013). For simplicity, the plot size used in this study was standardized to 400 m 2 , rather than varying from 400 to 900 m 2 as in the earlier publications.…”
Section: Study Area and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%