2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.71.064306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the single-proton and single-neutron potentials in asymmetric nuclear matter

Abstract: We discuss the one-body potentials for protons and neutrons obtained from Dirac-Brueckner-Hartree-Fock calculations of neutron-rich matter, in particular their dependence upon the degree of proton/neutron asymmetry. The closely related symmetry potential is compared with empirical information from the isovector component of the nuclear optical potential. 21.65.+f, 21.30.Fe

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
93
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(35 reference statements)
13
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, so far, no experimental data from finite nuclei has allowed a determination of the effective mass splitting but ab-initio Brueckner-Hartree-Fock calculation [24,26] have predicted m * n > m * p in neutron-rich matter. This result has been confirmed by relativistic calculations within the Dirac-BHF scheme [27] or within the DDRHF scheme [28]. Thus the sign of the splitting is rather solidly predicted although its amplitude is subject to a much greater uncertainty.…”
Section: B Asymmetric Mattersupporting
confidence: 67%
“…However, so far, no experimental data from finite nuclei has allowed a determination of the effective mass splitting but ab-initio Brueckner-Hartree-Fock calculation [24,26] have predicted m * n > m * p in neutron-rich matter. This result has been confirmed by relativistic calculations within the Dirac-BHF scheme [27] or within the DDRHF scheme [28]. Thus the sign of the splitting is rather solidly predicted although its amplitude is subject to a much greater uncertainty.…”
Section: B Asymmetric Mattersupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The exact K sat (δ) is obtained from Eqs. (21), (32), and (43), and corresponding results from Eq. (34) including terms up to δ 2 and up to δ 4 are also included for comparison.…”
Section: Binding Energy At Saturation Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the nuclear symmetry energy at ρ 0 is known to be around 30 MeV from the empirical liquid-drop mass formula [27,28], its values at other densities, especially at supra-saturation densities, are poorly known [6,7]. Various microscopic and phenomenological models, such as the relativistic Dirac-Brueckner-HartreeFock (DBHF) [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and the nonrelativistic BruecknerHartree-Fock (BHF) [36][37][38][39] approach, the relativistic mean-field (RMF) model based on nucleon-meson interactions [12,[40][41][42], and the nonrelativistic mean-field model based on Skyrme-like interactions [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51], have been used to study the isospin-dependent properties of asymmetric nuclear matter, such as the nuclear symmetry energy, the nuclear symmetry potential, and the isospin-splitting of the nucleon effective masses, but the predicted results vary widely. In fact, even the sign of the symmetry energy above 3ρ 0 is still uncertain [52,53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the nuclear symmetry energy at normal nuclear matter density ρ 0 ≈ 0.16 fm −3 is known to be around 30 MeV from the empirical liquid-drop mass formula [14,15], its values at other densities are poorly known [6,7]. Various microscopic and phenomenological models, such as the relativistic Dirac-Brueckner-HartreeFock (DBHF) [16,17,18,19,20,21,22] and the nonrelativistic Brueckner-Hartree-Fock (BHF) [23,24] approach, the relativistic mean-field (RMF) model based on nucleon-meson interactions [12], and the non-relativistic mean-field model based on Skyrme-like interactions [25,26,27,28,29,30,31], have been used to study the isospin-dependent properties of asymmetric nuclear matter, such as the nuclear symmetry energy, the nuclear symmetry potential, the isospin-splitting of nucleon effective mass, etc., but the predicted results vary widely. In fact, even the sign of the symmetry energy above 3ρ 0 is uncertain [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%