2014
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the severity of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis; the contribution of genetic factors

Abstract: Genetic risk factors together explained 12-18% of the variance in radiologic progression. Adding genetic factors improved the predictive accuracy, but 38% of the patients were still incorrectly classified, limiting the value for use in clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the usefulness of anti-CarP antibodies, in addition to ACPA and RF status, in identifying patients with no, moderate or severe progression, we assessed the net percentage of correctly reclassified patients 22. The progression in SHS during 5 years (ΔSHS 0–5 years ) was categorised in three severity groups: ΔSHS 0–5 years ≤5, 6–25 and >25 units, indicating no/little, moderate and severe radiographic progression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the usefulness of anti-CarP antibodies, in addition to ACPA and RF status, in identifying patients with no, moderate or severe progression, we assessed the net percentage of correctly reclassified patients 22. The progression in SHS during 5 years (ΔSHS 0–5 years ) was categorised in three severity groups: ΔSHS 0–5 years ≤5, 6–25 and >25 units, indicating no/little, moderate and severe radiographic progression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that genetic variants are potential prognostic markers. Current knowledge of the genetic architecture of radiograph progression is limited, with up to half of its heritability unexplained 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is currently a lack of genetic information for prediction of radiographic damage. According to a report by van Steenbergen et al, prediction accuracy of severe radiographic progression reached only 62% using a model consisting of 17 known genetic loci from several replication studies and meta-analysis and clinical factors [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%