Predicting the second wave of COVID-19 in Washtenaw County, MI

Abstract

<jats:p>Marissa Renardy and Denise Kirschner University of Michigan Medical School The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the patchwork nature of disease epidemics, with infection spread dynamics varying wildly across countries and across states within the US. These heteroge- neous patterns are also observed within individual states, with patches of concentrated outbreaks. Data is being generated daily at all of these spatial scales, and answers to questions regarded re- opening strategies are desperately needed. Mathematical modeling is useful in exactly these cases, and using modeling at a county scale may be valuable to further predict disease dynamics for the purposes of public health interventions. To explore this issue, we study and predict the spread of COVID-19 in Washtenaw County, MI, the home to University of Michigan, Eastern Michigan University, and Google, as well as serving as a sister city to Detroit, MI where there has been a serious outbreak. Here, we apply a discrete and stochastic network-based modeling framework allowing us to track every individual in the county. In this framework, we construct contact net- works based on synthetic population datasets specific for Washtenaw County that are derived from US Census datasets. We assign individuals to households, workplaces, schools, and group quarters (such as prisons). In addition, we assign casual contacts to each individual at random. Using this framework, we explicitly simulate Michigan-specific government-mandated workplace and school closures as well as social distancing measures. We also perform sensitivity analyses to identify key model parameters and mechanisms contributing to the observed disease burden in the three months following the first observed cases on COVID-19 in Michigan. We then consider several scenarios for relaxing restrictions and reopening workplaces to predict what actions would be most prudent. In particular, we consider the effects of 1) different timings for reopening, and 2) different levels of workplace vs. casual contact re-engagement. Through simulations and sensitivity analyses, we explore mechanisms driving magnitude and timing of a second wave of infections upon re-opening. This model can be adapted to other US counties using synthetic population databases and data specific to those regions.</jats:p>

Inverted Covariate Effects for First versus Mutated Second Wave Covid-19: High Temperature Spread Biased for Young

“…We explored temporal-, geographic-, demographic-and temperature-associated patterns of second wave spread parameters. We examined graphs plotting daily numbers of new confirmed cases (as daily updated at https://www.worldometers.info/ coronavirus/ [2]) for 123 countries. Second waves were visually determined, with examples in Figure 3 (Iran and Argentina).…”

“…UVs are highly mutagenic and can decrease viral “viability”. Prediction or early detection of second waves could be valuable for policy decisions [ 2 ] and seems more accurate than usually believed [ 3 ]. The same is true for determining climatic conditions favorable to viral spread [ 4 , 5 ].…”

Computational decision-support tools for urban design to improve resilience against COVID-19 and other infectious diseases: A systematic review

“…Rahman et al (2020) Vulnerability zoning of disease 1 district Country scale (64 districts) 1 day 154 days (a dataset) M.M. Rahman et al (2020) Individual behavioural changes; Internal travel restrictions; School and workplace measures and closures 1 country Global scale (88 countries) 1 day 5 weeks (a dataset) Ramchandani et al (2020) Individual behavioural changes; Internal travel restrictions; Density 1 county City scale (3146 counties) 1 day 84 days Renardy et al (2020) School and workplace measures and closures; Avoiding crowding – County scale 1 day 90 days Rezaei and Azarmi (2020) Contact tracing; Encouragement to keep a defined physical distance; Design of public/open spaces – – 1 s – Ridenhour et al (2011) Contact tracing; School and workplace measures and closures 1 m Building scale (school) 1 s 1 day Ronchi and Lovreglio (2020) Encouragement to keep a defined physical distance; Avoiding crowding; Design/Redesign of indoor spaces – Building scale 1 s – Satheesan et al (2020) Ventilation Multi-resolution: 0.167±0.012 μm (diameter of particles); 0.001 m (minimum length); 1.2 (mesh grid spacing) Building scale (inpatient ward cubicle) 1 s – Scarpone et al (2020) Density Multi-resolution: 100 m; 1 county Country scale (401 counties) – 2 months (a dataset) Shuvo et al (2020) Encouragement to keep a defined physical distance; Design/Redesign of indoor spaces – Building scale (hospital) 12 hours 200 days Small and Cavana...…”

Tackling the Waves of COVID-19: A Planning Model for Intrahospital Resource Allocation

“…Against this backdrop, the question arises when and how hospitals need to react and reallocate their personnel and material capacities to ICU wards and COVID-19 care. Some of the current models focused on predicting the infection rates in certain populations depending on mitigation measures (10)(11)(12). With this estimation, the fraction of infected patients in need for ICU care can be calculated and compared to existing capacities, leading to a valuation of potential capacity related deaths (13).…”