1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92829-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the Response of Prostatic Carcinoma to Endocrine Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1984
1984
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Median values for Stages A through D for cytosol were 8. 5,9,8,15.0, and 17.5, respectively. For the nucleus, the values were 19.0, 31.8, 38.0, and 44.5, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Median values for Stages A through D for cytosol were 8. 5,9,8,15.0, and 17.5, respectively. For the nucleus, the values were 19.0, 31.8, 38.0, and 44.5, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the standpoint of endocrinology, tissue contents of dihydrotestosterone [14,15] and of androgen receptor [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] also correlate with the response to endocrine therapy and prognosis, since responders usually show better survival rates than patients refractory to the ther apy. In this context, the relationship between pathologi cal grade and contents of dihydrotestosterone and of androgen receptor were examined, but no clear correla tion could be found [23], since heterogeneity in tissue component of prostatic cancer commonly observed may present a problem in accurate grading on tissues [24], Differences of tissue components for pathological exam ination and biochemical one may cause incorrect rela tionship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuclear androgen receptors are increasingly being promoted as more useful indicators of hormone dependence (Ghanadian, Auf, Williams et al 1981;Trachtenberg & Walsh, 1982;Brendler et al 1984;Gonor et al 1984;Fentie, Lakey & McBlain, 1986). The earlier studies were restricted to receptors extracted from nuclei at high ionic strength (Ghanadian et al 1981;Trachtenberg & Walsh, 1982). However, a significant nuclear popula¬ tion of androgen receptors resistant to such extrac¬ tions has been located on the nuclear matrix of rat ventral prostate cells (Barrack & Coffey, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%