2022
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2022.915756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the Popularity of Online Content by Modeling the Social Influence and Homophily Features

Abstract: Predicting the popularity of online content on social network can bring considerable economic benefits to companies and marketers, and it has wide application in viral marketing, content recommendation, early warning of social unrest, etc. The diffusion process of online contents is often a complex combination of both social influence and homophily; however, existing works either only consider the social influence or homophily of early infected users and fail to model the joint effect of social influence and h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The term "homophily" also known as "similarity," refers to "the extent to which persons with whom one interacts are similar in beliefs, education, social standing, values, attitudes and the like" (Eyal and Rubin, 2003;Gilly et al, 1998;Lazarsfeld and Merton, 1954). Homophily is more prevalent in the communication discipline, although it is a comparatively recent phenomenon in the marketing field, especially appearing in social contexts such as social commerce, netizens, bloggers and online content (Khanam et al, 2023a, b;Phua et al, 2017;Sakib et al, 2020;Shang et al, 2022;Sokolova and Kefi, 2020;Wang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Moderating Effect Of Homophilymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The term "homophily" also known as "similarity," refers to "the extent to which persons with whom one interacts are similar in beliefs, education, social standing, values, attitudes and the like" (Eyal and Rubin, 2003;Gilly et al, 1998;Lazarsfeld and Merton, 1954). Homophily is more prevalent in the communication discipline, although it is a comparatively recent phenomenon in the marketing field, especially appearing in social contexts such as social commerce, netizens, bloggers and online content (Khanam et al, 2023a, b;Phua et al, 2017;Sakib et al, 2020;Shang et al, 2022;Sokolova and Kefi, 2020;Wang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Moderating Effect Of Homophilymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homophily has been used to explain electronic word of mouth (eWOM), the experiences provided by websites, online content, the development of brands and athlete influencer credibility (Filieri et al, 2023;Leonhardt et al, 2020;Muda and Hamzah, 2021;Park et al, 2021;Phua et al, 2017;Shang et al, 2022;Su et al, 2023) and how different dimensions of homophily affect a person's popularity (Ladhari et al, 2020). According to McCroskey et al (1975), there exist four dimensions of homophily, namely attitude, background, morality and appearance.…”
Section: Moderating Effect Of Homophilymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shang et al [20] integrated social influence with homophily into a model to predict online content popularity. Dou et al [21] also predicted online content popularity with rich information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%