2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02303-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the outcomes of organic reactions via machine learning: are current descriptors sufficient?

Abstract: As machine learning/artificial intelligence algorithms are defeating chess masters and, most recently, GO champions, there is interest – and hope – that they will prove equally useful in assisting chemists in predicting outcomes of organic reactions. This paper demonstrates, however, that the applicability of machine learning to the problems of chemical reactivity over diverse types of chemistries remains limited – in particular, with the currently available chemical descriptors, fundamental mathematical theor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
110
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(45 reference statements)
3
110
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is important to point out that side chains may significantly affect solubility and morphology of materials. [56,65,[82][83][84] Technically, we split the dataset into two subsets of 250 (training and validating sets) and 30 (testing set) data points. IP(v), λ h and E bind were calculated for each system.…”
Section: Descriptors For Machine Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to point out that side chains may significantly affect solubility and morphology of materials. [56,65,[82][83][84] Technically, we split the dataset into two subsets of 250 (training and validating sets) and 30 (testing set) data points. IP(v), λ h and E bind were calculated for each system.…”
Section: Descriptors For Machine Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15] This should not come as a surprise, as it builds on a long tradition of using stereoelectronic parameters, Tolman's perhaps most prominently among them, 16 in this field. 17 Homogeneous catalysis is not (yet) data-rich enough to be considered amenable to "Big Data" approaches, [18][19][20][21] and machine-learning approaches, while used in this area, 9,[22][23][24][25] are still very much in their infancy, 26 but this provides a convenient opportunity to survey and collate available descriptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Im Jahr 2017 testeten Gambin et al. KI‐Algorithmen, um eine große Anzahl (450 000 Fälle) von vielfältigen organischen Reaktionen vorherzusagen, und betonten, dass die Identifizierung neuer chemoinformatischer Deskriptoren für zukünftige Entwicklungen essentiell sein könnte . Neben anderen wichtigen Versuchen, organische Reaktionen anhand von KI vorherzusagen und zu optimieren, sind die jüngsten Studien von Zare et al .…”
Section: Methodsunclassified