Abstract:Though clergy often serve as informal helpers and conduits to the formal mental health care system, few researchers have examined whether such clergy maintain the knowledge necessary to complete this mission. In this study, denominational affiliation, educational variables, and demographic characteristics were examined as potential predictors of mental health literacy (MHL). As a measure of MHL, the Mental Health Literacy Scale was completed by a nationwide sample of 238 Christian clergy. The results provided … Show more
“…Few studies have addressed demographic differences in MHL, including those along racial/ ethnic or gender lines. In one study, Vermaas et al (2017) found no differences in mental health literacy rates among clergy of various denominations, including historically Black protestant groups. Some research (Hee Yun Lee et al, 2020;Leighton, 2010) found evidence that there are gender differences in MHL, with women having more social support for and awareness of mental health disorders than do men.…”
“…Few studies have addressed demographic differences in MHL, including those along racial/ ethnic or gender lines. In one study, Vermaas et al (2017) found no differences in mental health literacy rates among clergy of various denominations, including historically Black protestant groups. Some research (Hee Yun Lee et al, 2020;Leighton, 2010) found evidence that there are gender differences in MHL, with women having more social support for and awareness of mental health disorders than do men.…”
“…As one might expect, these results are below that of mental health professionals [M = 145.5, SD = 7.2, N = 43; ( 31 )], t (106) = 10.33, p < 0.0001. They were also found to be lower than members of the clergy [M = 134.2, SD = 10.8, N = 238; ( 38 )], t (414) = 3.18, p = 0.002 who presumably have some experience of working with individuals with mental health concerns. Frontline pediatric staff's MHLS scores were found to be higher than a community sample [M = 127.38, SD = 12.63, N = 372; ( 31 )], t (413) = 3.18, p = 0.001 and UK medical students [M = 127.56, SD = 11.8, N = 25; ( 11 )], t (417) = 2.88, p = 0.004 who may not have had any prior exposure to working with mental health concerns.…”
Background: Children with chronic physical health conditions are up to six times more likely to develop a mental health condition than their physically well peers. Frontline pediatric hospital staff are in a good position to identify mental health problems and facilitate appropriate support for patients. To date, no evaluation of mental health literacy training has taken place with this professional group to enable early identification of difficulties. It is also not known whether face-to-face or digital training is more effective or preferable in this setting. To improve the skills of frontline hospital staff, a face-to-face and digital mental health literacy training course was delivered using MindEd content and evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.Method: Two-hundred and three frontline staff across different professions from a tertiary pediatric hospital were randomized to a face-to-face (n = 64), digital (n = 71), or waitlist control group (n = 68). Face-to-face training was two and a half hours and digital training took ~1 h. The effects of training were evaluated pre- and post-training and at two-week follow-up. Questionnaires assessed mental health knowledge, stigma, confidence in recognizing concerns and knowing what to do, actual helping behavior, as well as training delivery preference, completion rate, and satisfaction.Results: Both face-to-face and digital training increased mental health knowledge, confidence in recognizing mental health problems and knowing what to do compared to waitlist controls. Digital training increased actual helping behavior relative to the waitlist controls and stigma decreased across all groups. Staff were satisfied with both delivery methods but preferred face-to-face training.Conclusions: The results provide promising findings that digital content is an effective way of improving mental health literacy in frontline pediatric hospital staff. Providing digital training could be a time-efficient way of upskilling non-mental health professionals to identify mental health needs in a pediatric population and facilitate access to appropriate care.
“…However, the number of participants relatively low as compared to the current study. Vermaas, Green, Haley and Haddock (2017) administered the similar MHL scale to 238 clergy of different denominations across the United States. This study aims to compare the different of MHL score among different study groups consisting of evangelical Protestant (n=118), mainline Protestant (n=78), Catholic (n=39), historically Black Protestant (n=3) participants.…”
The aim of the study is to identify the level of mental health literacy among undergraduate students to explore the relationship between mental health literacy and help seeking behavior among UPSI students and to identify the significant difference in mental health literacy score for students who have encountered people with mental health disorders. The study adapted cross-sectional quantitative survey design. Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS) and General Help-Seeking Questionnaire are used in this study. N=130 UPSI students (n=25 male, n=105 female) completed the online survey which measure multiple dimensions of mental health literacy and help seeking behavior. The level of mental health literacy of undergraduate students was measured through the mean score of the MHLS. Result revealed a mean score of the MHLS obtained from the sample is (M=117.97, SD=14.62). This score is lower as compared to previous studies using the same scale. The Pearson correlation between mental health literacy and help-seeking behavior showed a negative, weak correlation (r= -.139) which is in contrast with the previous studies using the same scale. There is a significant difference in the mean score of the students who answer Yes and No for the screening question on knowing people with mental health disorders. In summary, the topic of mental health literacy is a new area to be explored in Malaysia and limited number of researches is available to compare the data.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.