2016
DOI: 10.3171/2015.6.peds14695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the limits of the endoscopic endonasal approach in children: a radiological anatomical study

Abstract: OBJECT The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been established as an alternative approach to craniovertebral junction (CVJ) pathology in adults. The authors have previously described the nasoaxial line (NAxL) as an accurate predictor of the lower limit of the EEA to the CVJ in adults. The surgical anatomy limiting the EEA to the pediatric CVJ has not been well studied. Furthermore, predicting the lower limit of the EEA in various pediatric age groups is importan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…29 Wider intercarotid distance and shorter nare-dens working distance are associated with better resection outcomes. 4,39 In our study, the cavernous intercarotid distance of the overall study cohort, whose mean age was in the early teens, was comparable to the length reported in adults. 26 The lack of significant difference in cavernous intercarotid distance between adults and children older than 9 years has been previously reported.…”
Section: Anatomical Limitationssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…29 Wider intercarotid distance and shorter nare-dens working distance are associated with better resection outcomes. 4,39 In our study, the cavernous intercarotid distance of the overall study cohort, whose mean age was in the early teens, was comparable to the length reported in adults. 26 The lack of significant difference in cavernous intercarotid distance between adults and children older than 9 years has been previously reported.…”
Section: Anatomical Limitationssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Prior radioanatomic studies revealed no statistically significant increase in piriform aperture diameter from that of the neonate until 15 to 18 years, but the clinical significance of these small changes is notable. While the authors report clinically meaningful increases in piriform distance at 10 years of age, we would propose that the clinical ease of access undergoes clinically significant increased size between 2 and 6 years. With small changes in diameter from 15 to 20 mm, the cross‐sectional area nearly doubles, affording four‐handed instrumentation with greater ease and in the experience of the authors, a piriform diameter greater than 2 cm affords unrestricted access for four‐handed surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The published norms for piriform aperture width at birth, 2 years, and 5 years reveal increasing diameter from 15 to 18 mm to greater than 20 mm, respectively . Prior radioanatomic studies revealed no statistically significant increase in piriform aperture diameter from that of the neonate until 15 to 18 years, but the clinical significance of these small changes is notable. While the authors report clinically meaningful increases in piriform distance at 10 years of age, we would propose that the clinical ease of access undergoes clinically significant increased size between 2 and 6 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The following approaches are currently applied for surgical extirpation of anterior skull base tumors in children: (1) subfrontal, (2) subcranial, (3) transfacial/transmaxillary, (4) combined subcranial-transfacial approach, (5) combined subcranial-midfacial degloving, and (6) combined subcranialtransorbital. 1,3,4,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The approaches which are used most widely for surgical resection of anterior skull base tumors are the transfacial/ transmaxillary, subcranial, and subfrontal approaches. [3][4][5] Bilateral/Unilateral Subfrontal Approach This approach is primarily used for tumors of the anterior skull base with intracranial involvement.…”
Section: Open Approaches To the Anterior Skull Base In Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%