Predicting the future in schizophrenia: The discrepancy between anticipatory and consummatory pleasure

Edwards, Clementine; Cella, Matteo; Tarrier, Nicholas; Wykes, Til

doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.091

Cited by 20 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 52 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ten studies found no group differences in anticipatory pleasure [77–79, 39, 80–85]. Eight studies found lower consummatory pleasure in schizophrenia patients than controls [78, 71, 72, 74, 81–83, 75], while 12 found no group differences in consummatory pleasure [52, 85, 84, 80, 39, 79, 73, 70, 9, 69, 77, 67]. Eleven studies have reported group means for the TEPS subscales in patient and control groups, which provide evidence for numerically lower consummatory and anticipatory pleasure in schizophrenia: Schizophrenia anticipatory = 4.17; Control anticipatory = 4.54; Schizophrenia consummatory = 3.99; Control consummatory = 4.35.…”

Section: Anticipatory Affect Affective Forecasting and Prospectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One study used the Components of Pleasure Task (COP: [78]) to measure anticipatory and consummatory emotion. In this task, participants were directed to rate positive, negative, and neutral stimuli on valence and arousal, and then were trained to associate a subset of the pictures with neutral shape cues.…”

Section: Anticipatory Affect Affective Forecasting and Prospectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…After completing the learning phase, participants were asked to rate their experience of pleasure to the cue itself (anticipatory affect). Results found no significant differences between anticipatory and overall consummatory ratings, although individuals with schizophrenia rated physical pleasant stimuli as significantly less pleasant than controls [78]. Another study focused on affective forecasting in social situations.…”

Section: Anticipatory Affect Affective Forecasting and Prospectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Review of Anticipatory Pleasure in Schizophrenia

Frost

Strauss

2016

Curr Behav Neurosci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of Review Anhedonia, traditionally defined as a diminished capacity to experience pleasure, has long been considered a core symptom of schizophrenia. However, recent research calls into question whether individuals with schizophrenia are truly anhedonic, suggesting intact subjective and neurophysiological response to rewarding stimuli in-the-moment. Despite a presumably intact capacity to experience pleasure, people with schizophrenia still engage in fewer reward-seeking behaviors. This discrepancy has been explained as a dissociation between “liking” and “wanting”, with dopaminergic and prefrontal influences on incentive salience leading hedonic responses to not effectively translate into motivated behavior. In the current review, the literature on a key aspect of the wanting deficit is reviewed, anticipatory pleasure. Recent Findings Results provide consistent evidence for impairment in some aspects of anticipatory pleasure (e.g., prospection, associative learning between reward predictive cues and outcomes), and inconsistent evidence for others (e.g., anticipatory affect and affective forecasting). Summary Mechanisms underlying anticipatory pleasure abnormalities in schizophrenia are discussed and a new model of anticipatory pleasure deficits is proposed. Findings suggest that anticipatory pleasure may be a critical component of impairments in wanting that impact motivated behavior in schizophrenia.

show abstract

Section: Anticipatory Affect Affective Forecasting and Prospectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Anticipatory Affect Affective Forecasting and Prospectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Anticipatory Affect Affective Forecasting and Prospectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Review of Anticipatory Pleasure in Schizophrenia

Frost

Strauss

2016

Curr Behav Neurosci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Another future direction for the ACIPS as a self-report scale would be to include patients in the identification of their interpersonal pleasure deficits and use the scale to help personalize interventions. It should be noted that despite the absence of relevance of the two-factor model for the ACIPS, therapies which focus on anticipating pleasurable moments are likely to be beneficial to patients with demonstrable deficits in these areas, such as patients with schizophrenia ( Edwards et al, 2015 ). Self-report scales may be limited because we tend to think about our reaction to the most recent event or they tend to be decontextualized.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the French Version of the Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale

Chaix

Golay²,

Fankhauser

et al. 2017

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale (ACIPS), a measure specifically designed to assess hedonic capacity for social and interpersonal pleasure, was used to evaluate the presence of social anhedonia in patients as well as the general population. The first goal of this study was to validate the structure of the French version of the ACIPS. The second objective was to verify whether a one, two or three factor solution is most appropriate for the ACIPS scale. The French version of the ACIPS was tested on 263 French-speaking pre-graduate students or professional volunteers. For the confirmatory factor analysis, data were treated as categorical ordinal and all the models were estimated using a robust weighted least squares estimator with adjustments for the mean and variance. Three models were estimated. A one-factor model representing a general undifferentiated “pleasure” latent construct was first tested on the 17 ACIPS items. A two-factor model distinguishing anticipatory-pleasure and consummatory-pleasure was tested next. Finally, a three-factor model including subdomains of intimate social interactions, group social interactions, and social bonding was tested. The one and two-factor models showed a somewhat poor fit to the data. However, the goodness of fit of the three factor model was adequate. These results suggest that individuals who enjoyed interaction in one of these three subdomains were more likely to enjoy doing so in the two other domains. However, on the basis of the comparison between the one and three factor models, these three types of interactions may not be considered as indistinguishable. Rather, they represent distinct and theoretically meaningful dimensions. These results show the French version of the ACIPS is a useful and valid scale to measure the capacity of savoring different kinds of social relationships.

show abstract

“…[42][43][44] In line with these findings, there is also evidence of reduced neural responses to reward-predicting cues in both medicated and unmedicated patients with SZ. [45][46][47] Some, [48][49][50][51] but not all, [52][53][54][55] studies utilizing the TEPS, developed to assess physical anhedonia (including sensory experiences) in SZ, report a specific reduction in anticipatory pleasure. Interestingly, these impairments have been linked to the overall severity of negative symptoms, including anhedonia 48,51 and amotivation.…”

Section: The Pre S Entati On Of Anhedonia In Mdd and Szmentioning

confidence: 99%