1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf00750805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the field performance of twelve commercial liming materials from southern Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Lime quality in terms of its the neutralizing value and solubility affects the performance of different limestones (Conyers et al., 1996). Likewise, there are large differences in the elemental composition of quarried limestone material and these differences exist spatially across the UK (Chater & Williams, 1974); Nitrogen (N) supply is a major driver of crop yield and its interaction with soil pH can influence crop responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Lime quality in terms of its the neutralizing value and solubility affects the performance of different limestones (Conyers et al., 1996). Likewise, there are large differences in the elemental composition of quarried limestone material and these differences exist spatially across the UK (Chater & Williams, 1974); Nitrogen (N) supply is a major driver of crop yield and its interaction with soil pH can influence crop responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conyers et al [76], working with 12 liming materials from NSW, Australia, defined the relative physical efficiency (essentially the particle size) and the relative chemical efficiency (lime equivalence and chemical composition). They found good agreement between the measured and actual total efficiency (the product of the physical and chemical efficiency) as measured in the field.…”
Section: Quality Of Limementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no agreement on the ideal lime particle size either in Galicia or elsewhere in the world. Among the international publications on this subject, those of Scott et al (1992), Hodge and Lewis (1994), Conyers et al (1996), Haby and Leonard (2002), and Mello et al (2003) are worth mention. It is well known that the particle size of amending material affects productivity (Haby and Leonard, 2002) by affecting the rate at which the material goes into the soil solution, so the finer the particle size, the greater and faster the soil pH change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%