2016
DOI: 10.1002/etc.3192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the effects of copper on local population decline of 2 marine organisms, cobia fish and whiteleg shrimp, based on avoidance response

Abstract: The present study focuses on avoidance response to predict population decline of the marine fish Rachycentron canadum (cobia) and larvae of the estuarine shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (whiteleg shrimp). Avoidance of approximately 60% was recorded for the cobia fry exposed to 1.0 mg Cu/L, 1.60 mg Cu/L, and 1.80 mg Cu/L. For the shrimp larvae, avoidance was approximately 80% for all Cu concentrations. The population decline of cobia fry was conditioned by avoidance in lower concentrations. However, in higher conce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirmed that there were no external interferences (such as light or noise) or interactions among the organisms. In other studies using the non-forced exposure system, similar responses were observed for the fish species D. rerio , Rachycentron canadum (Araújo et al, 2015),…”
Section: Distribution Control In the Absence Of A Contamination Gradientsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This confirmed that there were no external interferences (such as light or noise) or interactions among the organisms. In other studies using the non-forced exposure system, similar responses were observed for the fish species D. rerio , Rachycentron canadum (Araújo et al, 2015),…”
Section: Distribution Control In the Absence Of A Contamination Gradientsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Several studies have been using the non-forced exposure system, and fish responses are similar to those described in this paper, such as D. rerio , Rachycentron canadum (Araújo et al, 2015) and Oreochromis sp. (Araújo et al, 2016).…”
Section: ~ 6 ~mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This behavior validates the avoidance tests because it indicates that there is no other environmental factor (associated either to the laboratory conditions, to the exposure system, or to the shrimps' behavior) influencing habitat selection by the shrimps. Previous studies using nonforced exposure systems with different organisms, such as shrimps, tadpoles, and fish, have also shown that organisms presented a random distribution with no preference for any compartment of the system in the absence of a contaminant (Moreira-Santos et al 2008;Ara ujo et al 2014Ara ujo et al , 2016aAra ujo et al , 2018Silva et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Previous studies using nonforced exposure systems with different organisms, such as shrimps, tadpoles, and fish, have also shown that organisms presented a random distribution with no preference for any compartment of the system in the absence of a contaminant (Moreira-Santos et al 2008;Ara ujo et al 2014Ara ujo et al , 2016aAra ujo et al , 2018Silva et al 2018). Initially, it was observed that the shrimp distribution was similar when there was no contamination gradient in the system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It was expected that the less aggressive species would be displaced towards previously avoided contaminated habitats. Copper (Cu 2+ ) was selected as a test contaminant as it is an avoidable pollutant for fish (Moreira-Santos et al, 2008;Araújo et al, 2015) and produces toxic effects such as chemosensory deprivation (McIntyre et al, 2008), changes in gene expression (Craig et al, 2010), feeding inhibition (Abdel-Moneim et al, 2015), effects on the swimming performance of larvae (Acosta et al, 2016), morphological and metabolic alterations (Chatterjee et al, 2016), and changes in the surfaces of the gills (Fu et al, 2016). P. reticulata and D. rerio were selected as test organisms because they (i) are easy to cultivate, (ii) are widely used as model organisms in the fields of ecology, evolution, and ethology, and (iii) have already been shown to spatially avoid chemical contamination (Moreira-Santos et al, 2008;Silva et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%