2016
DOI: 10.28991/cej-2016-00000008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the Earthquake Magnitude Using the Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network with Two Hidden Layers

Abstract: Because of the major disadvantages of previous methods for calculating the magnitude of the earthquakes, the neural network as a new method is examined. In this paper a kind of neural network named Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) is used to predict magnitude of earthquakes. MLP neural network consist of three main layers; input layer, hidden layer and output layer. Since the best network configurations such as the best number of hidden nodes and the most appropriate training method cannot be determined in advance,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…10.1029/2019RS006931 fault zones (Kannan, 2014), and an empirical probabilistic model that had been proposed to predict onset and magnitude of an upcoming EQ (Papazachos & Papaioannou, 1993). Several machine learning models are also implemented on past seismic activity data to predict EQ onset, magnitude, or epicenter such as decision trees, random forest, AdaBoost, information network, multiobjective info-fuzzy network, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural networks (Asencio-Cortés et al, 2015, 2016Last et al, 2016;Mahmoudi et al, 2016;Moustra et al, 2011) , support vector regressors and hybrid neural networks trained on an EQ catalog (Asim et al, 2018), deep neural networks (Panakkat & Adeli, 2009;Wang et al, 2017), and convolutional neural networks to predict an upcoming EQ with seismic waveforms of length of 100 s Ibrahim et al (2018).…”
Section: Radio Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10.1029/2019RS006931 fault zones (Kannan, 2014), and an empirical probabilistic model that had been proposed to predict onset and magnitude of an upcoming EQ (Papazachos & Papaioannou, 1993). Several machine learning models are also implemented on past seismic activity data to predict EQ onset, magnitude, or epicenter such as decision trees, random forest, AdaBoost, information network, multiobjective info-fuzzy network, k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural networks (Asencio-Cortés et al, 2015, 2016Last et al, 2016;Mahmoudi et al, 2016;Moustra et al, 2011) , support vector regressors and hybrid neural networks trained on an EQ catalog (Asim et al, 2018), deep neural networks (Panakkat & Adeli, 2009;Wang et al, 2017), and convolutional neural networks to predict an upcoming EQ with seismic waveforms of length of 100 s Ibrahim et al (2018).…”
Section: Radio Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the proposed mathematical models can be listed as fault line strain related force models that are investigated to suggest a periodicity in EQ appearances (Bendick & Bilham, 2017), Fibonacci, Lucas, Dual (FDL) numbers that are embedded in the occurrence times of old EQs to predict the upcoming EQ onsets (Boucouvalas et al, 2015), spatial connection model that fits to the EQ occurrence pattern around the fault zones (Kannan, 2014), and an empirical probabilistic model that had been proposed to predict onset and magnitude of an upcoming EQ (Papazachos & Papaioannou, 1993). Several machine learning models are also implemented on past seismic activity data to predict EQ onset, magnitude, or epicenter such as decision trees, random forest, AdaBoost, information network, multiobjective info‐fuzzy network, k ‐nearest neighbors, support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural networks (Asencio‐Cortés et al, 2015, 2016; Last et al, 2016; Mahmoudi et al, 2016; Moustra et al, 2011) , support vector regressors and hybrid neural networks trained on an EQ catalog (Asim et al, 2018), deep neural networks (Panakkat & Adeli, 2009; Wang et al, 2017), and convolutional neural networks to predict an upcoming EQ with seismic waveforms of length of 100 s Ibrahim et al (2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Penelitian [8] telah mengusulkan perceptron multilayer untuk memprediksi besarnya gempa bumi, terdiri dari tiga lapisan utama; lapisan input, lapisan tersembunyi dan lapisan keluaran. Hasil percobaan menunjukkan bahwa jaringan saraf plastik menghasilkan 128 model untuk menentukan model prediksi terbaik.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Most hydrologic processes exhibit a high degree of temporal and spatial variability, and are further plagued by issues of nonlinearity of physical processes, conflicting spatial and temporal scale, and uncertainty in parameter estimates. Over the past years, artificial intelligence techniques have been frequently used to predict nonlinear problems and achieved good results [2][3][4][5][6]. Also, conjunction with wavelet transform enhances ANN popularity which Wavelet-ANN or wavelet-ANFIS models were successfully hired for nonlinear time series forecasting [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%