2015
DOI: 10.1002/widm.1150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the dynamics of social circles in ego networks using pattern analysis and GA K‐means clustering

Abstract: The tremendous amount of content generated on online social networks has led to a radical paradigm shift in the interest of people to group friends dynamically and share content selectively. At large, social networking sites (e.g. Google+, Facebook, Twitter, etc.) offer users with various controls over categorizing their family members, friends, colleagues, etc. into one or more ‘circles’ that they want to share content with. However, it is typically impossible to design social circles in large networks and up… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose unsupervised learning to overcome the limitations of a priori assumptions of connectivity patterns. Machine learning techniques have been widely used to study network-based data for different purposes, such as finding a prevalent subgraph pattern (Cook & Holder, 2006), classifying or identifying different members (nodes) from a communication/social network (Alsayat & El-Sayed, 2016;Nurek & Michalski, 2020), or measuring dynamics in networks (Agarwal & Bharadwaj, 2015).…”
Section: Choosing a Clustering Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose unsupervised learning to overcome the limitations of a priori assumptions of connectivity patterns. Machine learning techniques have been widely used to study network-based data for different purposes, such as finding a prevalent subgraph pattern (Cook & Holder, 2006), classifying or identifying different members (nodes) from a communication/social network (Alsayat & El-Sayed, 2016;Nurek & Michalski, 2020), or measuring dynamics in networks (Agarwal & Bharadwaj, 2015).…”
Section: Choosing a Clustering Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are applicable only to evaluation ratings, and they cannot effectively solve the problem of data sparsity. Agarwal and Bharadwaj [25] use GA to predict unknown evaluation values based on evaluation values and trust, to improve the accuracy of the recommendation results. Bedi and Sharma [26] proposed a method called the trust-based ant recommendation system (TAS), which metaphorizes the trust relationship between the users to the biology of ant colonies.…”
Section: User-based Collaborative Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GA k‐means algorithm is applied to the outcome of factorization (latent factor matrix F ) to obtain desirable communities. The reasons that underpin the adoption of a GA‐based approach are it performs a global search in the problem space and can be easily hybridized and extended to suit any problem structure …”
Section: The Proposed Model For Discovering Communities In Multi‐relamentioning
confidence: 99%