2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00212.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the direction of sexual selection

Abstract: Our current understanding of the operation of sexual selection is predicated on a sex difference in parental investment, which favours one sex becoming limiting and choosy over mates, the other competitive and nonchoosy. This difference is reflected in the operational sex ratio (OSR), the ratio of sexually receptive males to females, considered to be of fundamental importance in predicting the direction of sexual selection. Difficulties in measuring OSR directly have led to the use of the potential reproductiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

17
263
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
17
263
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As in the model of Kokko and Monaghan (2001), we use lifetime reproductive success as fitness measure. The number of offspring a female can produce per mating depends on the number of sperm the male transmits in each spermatophore.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As in the model of Kokko and Monaghan (2001), we use lifetime reproductive success as fitness measure. The number of offspring a female can produce per mating depends on the number of sperm the male transmits in each spermatophore.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each parameter combination, we first calculate the lifetime reproductive success W of all strategies. Female fitness is calculated according to Kokko and Monaghan (2001) as Mean length of accepted mates mm…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, in avian species where just female care is observed the ASR tends to be female biased. Kokko and Monaghan (2001) note that the relationship between mortality and patterns of parental care may be complex. For example, suppose in a species where only female care is observed, the mortality rate of males increases due to increased male-male competition (this may be due to density dependent effects).…”
Section: This Leads Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By definition, biases in this ratio lead to stronger intrasexual competition for mates in the sex occurring in 'excess' while favouring the evolution of greater selectivity in the choice of mating partners by the sex in 'shortage' (Clutton-Brock & Parker 1992;Kokko & Monaghan 2001;Clutton-Brock 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%