2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41550-018-0562-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the corona for the 21 August 2017 total solar eclipse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
137
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(129 reference statements)
1
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3.1 and 3.2 show that the WTD model described in Sec. 2 cannot reproduce the charge states of ions in the solar wind, we have looked for possible improvements that may also be implemented in the 3D model of Mikić et al (2018). One possible reason why the charge states in our model are too low is that we do not include the effect of a suprathermal electron tail in the corona that would increase the ionization coefficients (Ko et al, 1996;Esser, Edgar, and Brickhouse, 1998;Cranmer, 2014).…”
Section: Correcting the Ion Outflow Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3.1 and 3.2 show that the WTD model described in Sec. 2 cannot reproduce the charge states of ions in the solar wind, we have looked for possible improvements that may also be implemented in the 3D model of Mikić et al (2018). One possible reason why the charge states in our model are too low is that we do not include the effect of a suprathermal electron tail in the corona that would increase the ionization coefficients (Ko et al, 1996;Esser, Edgar, and Brickhouse, 1998;Cranmer, 2014).…”
Section: Correcting the Ion Outflow Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oran et al (2015) pioneered in this effort by using an external code to evaluate charge states in the solar wind calculation obtained with the Alfvén Wave Solar Model (AWSoM), and comparing them with in situ measurements from Ulysses. Recently we incorporated a Wave-Turbulence-Driven (WTD) formulation for coronal heating and solar wind acceleration by Alfvénic turbulence into a 3D MHD model of the global solar corona (Mikić et al, 2018). In this effort, we constrained the model by forward modeling EUV, X-Ray, and white-light coronal emission and comparing directly to observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we are dealing with a corona close to the minimum of solar activity, two main parts around the Sun are prominent: first, equatorial regions with big loops and arches of the extended streamers, and second, the polar regions with coronal holes (see Fig. 3 and Mikić et al 2018, dealing with the modeling of coronal structures). Intermediate regions can also be discussed, such as the eastern active region and the edges of streamers or edges of CHs.…”
Section: The K and F Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mikić et al 1999;Lionello et al 2009;Downs et al 2013;Caplan et al 2017), which was used to predict the structure of the global corona during the 21 August 2017 total solar eclipse. Described in detail by Mikić et al (2018), this calculation employed high-fidelity magnetic field observations at the inner boundary, a new Wave-Turbulence-Driven (WTD) coronal heating model (Downs et al 2016), and a method to energize large-scale magnetic flux-systems in the low corona. Forward modeled observables, including SDO/AIA EUV images, temperature maps from DEM inversions, and broadband visible light images, compared favorably with observations, making this an ideal model to use here.…”
Section: Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%