2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.04.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting the activity of drugs for a group of imidazopyridine anticoccidial compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar performances of GEP were obtained in comparison with SVM ( r = 0.91 versus r = 0.86 on the training set, including 36 compounds). GEP technique has also been profitably used for the prediction of IC 50 values of 38 imidazopyridine anticoccidial compounds ( r = 0.96 and r = 0.91 on the training set and the test set, respectively) …”
Section: Applications In Pharmacodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar performances of GEP were obtained in comparison with SVM ( r = 0.91 versus r = 0.86 on the training set, including 36 compounds). GEP technique has also been profitably used for the prediction of IC 50 values of 38 imidazopyridine anticoccidial compounds ( r = 0.96 and r = 0.91 on the training set and the test set, respectively) …”
Section: Applications In Pharmacodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GEP technique has also been profitably used for the prediction of IC 50 values of 38 imidazopyridine anticoccidial compounds (r ) 0.96 and r ) 0.91 on the training set and the test set, respectively). 78 Both regression and classification analysis can be applied to the same problem to obtain different information on binding affinity and selectivity of the compounds. This approach has been utilized to predict the specificity and subtype selectivity of 5HT1E and 5HT1F serotonin receptors ligands.…”
Section: Qsarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to avoid the collinearity in the process of developing of the multiple regression equation [19]. The correlation coefficient between descriptors is given in the Fig.3 with the good result of 0.065, which implies that the statistical relationship between descriptors is extremely small and proves the statistical reliability of the method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the possible solutions in the problem domain as an individual or a chromosome of the group, coding the individual into the form of symbol string, carrying out repeated operation on the group based on the genetics (genetics, intersection, and heteromorphosis), evaluating the individuals according to the scheduled target fitness function, constantly obtaining better groups according to the evolution rule of “survival of the fittest,” and, meanwhile, searching the optimum individual with the searching approach in the overall situation to obtain the satisfied and optimal solutions, it has extremely strong generalization ability and has been used for the QSAR study of the drug [2225]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%