2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2020.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting TBM penetration rate in hard rock condition: A comparative study among six XGB-based metaheuristic techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…M features are randomly selected from all feature sets during tree generation, and then an optimal eigenvalue mtry is selected as the split variable value according to the criterion of the maximum information gain ratio. Through the establishment of the RF model, the trend of ntree and the mean-square error is observed, and the decision tree corresponding to the minimum root-mean-square error (RMSE) is chosen as the best ntree value -that is, the number of regression trees (Zhou et al, 2021b). ( 3) Training model establishment.…”
Section: Optimal Parameter Determination and Training Model Establishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M features are randomly selected from all feature sets during tree generation, and then an optimal eigenvalue mtry is selected as the split variable value according to the criterion of the maximum information gain ratio. Through the establishment of the RF model, the trend of ntree and the mean-square error is observed, and the decision tree corresponding to the minimum root-mean-square error (RMSE) is chosen as the best ntree value -that is, the number of regression trees (Zhou et al, 2021b). ( 3) Training model establishment.…”
Section: Optimal Parameter Determination and Training Model Establishmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the comparison of the model performance, three performance metrics including R 2 , RMSE, and VAF were applied, and a prediction model can be considered as the best model when R 2 � 1, RMSE � 0, and VAF � 100. Meanwhile, the value of these performance metrics can be calculated using the following formula [32,[82][83][84][85][86][87]: where N, y, y, and y pre are the number of datasets, the average PPV values, the actual PPV values, and the predicted PPV values, respectively.…”
Section: Performance Of Various Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the structural design and vibration reduction optimization of the cutterhead system. Liu, 14 Hasanpour et al, 15,16 and Afrasiabi et al 1723 were devoted to studying various performance parameters that affect the work of TBM, such as rock parameters and machine parameters to establish prediction theoretical models of TBM performance. Methods such as “penalty factor” and “pso-ann hybrid model” were proposed to estimate the performance of TBM, which enriched the theoretical model of intelligent prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%