2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15711-0_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Target Vessel Location for Improved Planning of Robot-Assisted CABG Procedures

Abstract: Abstract. Prior to performing a robot-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting procedure, a pre-operative computed tomography scan is used to assess patient candidacy and to identify the location of the target vessel. The surgeon then determines the optimal port locations to ensure proper reach to the target with the robotic instruments, while assuming that the heart does not undergo any significant changes between the preand intra-operative stages. However, the peri-operative workflow itself leads to changes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique has recently been implemented and validated in a beating heart phantom (The Chamberlain Group, Great Barrington, MA USA) and yielded an approximately 3.5-mm accuracy in predicting the perioperative LAD location based on its preoperative location and the perioperatively identified features. 17 Further studies involving the use of ex vivo porcine hearts and in vivo experiments are currently under investigation for a more robust evaluation of this technique. Such studies will also focus on quantifying the target registration error at the coronary vessels of interest (LAD) and other epicardial features; however, for these studies to be relevant, it is critical to identify the gold-standard position of the features of interest against which their predicted locations can be assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has recently been implemented and validated in a beating heart phantom (The Chamberlain Group, Great Barrington, MA USA) and yielded an approximately 3.5-mm accuracy in predicting the perioperative LAD location based on its preoperative location and the perioperatively identified features. 17 Further studies involving the use of ex vivo porcine hearts and in vivo experiments are currently under investigation for a more robust evaluation of this technique. Such studies will also focus on quantifying the target registration error at the coronary vessels of interest (LAD) and other epicardial features; however, for these studies to be relevant, it is critical to identify the gold-standard position of the features of interest against which their predicted locations can be assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A robust ICP-based registration algorithm was proposed and compared with our previous weighted landmark-based registration 29 in the context of this study. While the weighted landmark-based approach was limited to the use of four anatomical landmarks for registration, the robust approach used the complete geometry of the landmarks of interest.…”
Section: Iva In Vitro Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid such situations, a better prediction of the intra-operative target vessel location is needed. Since the trocar can be repositioned in one rib space increment, a clinically-imposed accuracy on the order of one intercostal space (10–15 mm) may be deemed sufficient [13]. …”
Section: Clinical Accuracy Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its location was predicted via a registration algorithm that involves four features — left coronary ostia, mitral valve annulus, aortic valve annulus and left ventricular apex — all of which were easily identifiable in both modalities and sufficiently close to the target vessel to provide improved accuracy in the region of interest. The rigid-body registration driven by the above features was employed to map the pre-operative dataset to the peri-operative datasets (following left lung deflation and thoracic insufflation), predicting the LAD location at each subsequent stage [13]. According to preliminary phantom studies, this technique yielded a root-mean-squared (RMS) target registration error (TRE) of 3.5 mm at the target vessel, which is within the clinical requirements for the intended application (Fig.…”
Section: Engineering Accuracy Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%