2022
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-ssvwl
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Structural Properties of Pure Silica Zeolites Using Deep Neural Network Potentials

Abstract: Machine learning potentials (MLPs) capable of accurately describing complex ab initio potential energy surfaces (PES) have revolutionized the field of multiscale atomistic modeling. In this work, using an extensive density functional theory (DFT) dataset (denoted as Si-ZEO22) consisting of 187 unique silica topologies found in the International Zeolite Association (IZA) database, we have trained a DeePMD-kit MLP to model the dynamics of silica frameworks. The performance of our model is evaluated by calculatin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, this step samples the forces on the oxygen from [CuOCu] 2+ (denoted as f_O) -the histogram in Fig.7bshows that the model now has seen a much wider distribution of forces than what was available during the DFT/NEB. Additionally, the DFT/cMD also samples the zeolite backbone, which is shown previously by Sours et al79 .The remaining steps are more obvious. From right to left (or bottom to top), we have the initial states sampled by DP/MD at stage C1 (colored in blue), followed by the reactive region sampled by DP/NEB in stage C2 for a single site and D for all other MOR sites (colored in green) and then ends with the orange region for the final states (also sampled by DP/MD at stage C1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, this step samples the forces on the oxygen from [CuOCu] 2+ (denoted as f_O) -the histogram in Fig.7bshows that the model now has seen a much wider distribution of forces than what was available during the DFT/NEB. Additionally, the DFT/cMD also samples the zeolite backbone, which is shown previously by Sours et al79 .The remaining steps are more obvious. From right to left (or bottom to top), we have the initial states sampled by DP/MD at stage C1 (colored in blue), followed by the reactive region sampled by DP/NEB in stage C2 for a single site and D for all other MOR sites (colored in green) and then ends with the orange region for the final states (also sampled by DP/MD at stage C1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The resulting dataset, denoted as rCuZEO23 (detailed in the SI, Section S2), is iteratively used to train a deep neural network-based potential. 79 We show that the resulting rMLP replaces the expensive DFT-based NEB calculations without any appreciable loss in accuracy -we evaluate C-H bond activation energies for 5,400 distinct sites across 52 zeolites within a couple minutes (per calculation) and obtain 3,356 valid sites suitable for methane activation. Our predictions are within 0.07 eV of the DFT computed energy barriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations