2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting stellar angular diameters from V, IC, H and K photometry

Abstract: Determining the physical properties of microlensing events depends on having accurate angular sizes of the source star. Using long-baseline optical interferometry we are able to measure the angular sizes of nearby stars with uncertainties ≤ 2%. We present empirically derived relations of angular diameters that are calibrated using both a sample of dwarfs/subgiants and a sample of giant stars. These relations are functions of five color indices in the visible and near-infrared, and have uncertainties of 1.8-6.5… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Groenewegen (2004) published a CSB relation for M giants (3.2 < (V − K) 0 < 6.1), which gives angular radii that are systematically 10% lower than those based on Kervella et al (2004): θ * = 10.9 ± 0.7 µas (OGLE-2012-BLG-1323) and θ * = 29.8 ± 1.9 µas (OGLE-2017-BLG-0560). Adams et al (2018) recently published a new CSB relation for giants (−0.01 < (V − I) 0 < 1.74), from which we find θ * = 11.5 ± 0.9 µas (OGLE-2012-BLG-1323) and θ * = 32.3 ± 2.3 µas (OGLE-2017-BLG-0560), in good agreement with our determination. 11.9 ± 0.5 34.9 ± 1.5 15.1 ± 0.8…”
Section: Source Starssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Groenewegen (2004) published a CSB relation for M giants (3.2 < (V − K) 0 < 6.1), which gives angular radii that are systematically 10% lower than those based on Kervella et al (2004): θ * = 10.9 ± 0.7 µas (OGLE-2012-BLG-1323) and θ * = 29.8 ± 1.9 µas (OGLE-2017-BLG-0560). Adams et al (2018) recently published a new CSB relation for giants (−0.01 < (V − I) 0 < 1.74), from which we find θ * = 11.5 ± 0.9 µas (OGLE-2012-BLG-1323) and θ * = 32.3 ± 2.3 µas (OGLE-2017-BLG-0560), in good agreement with our determination. 11.9 ± 0.5 34.9 ± 1.5 15.1 ± 0.8…”
Section: Source Starssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We interpolate the color tables in Bessell & Brett (1988) to arrive at a (V − K, K) source = (1.78 ± 0.04, 14.00 ± 0.06). Using the relationship between stellar angular size, (V − K) color, and K-magnitude given by Adams et al (2018), the source angular radius θ = 3.4 ± 0.2 µas.…”
Section: Source Star Limb Darkening and Angular Radiusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, the sharp planetary light-curve features enable a precise measurement of the source radius crossing time, t * . This provides a determination of the angular Einstein radius, θ E =θ * t E /t * , if we know the angular radius of the source star, θ * , which can be determined from the dereddened source magnitude and color (Kervella et al 2004;Boyajian et al 2014;Adams et al 2016). We determine θ * in Section 4.1.…”
Section: Lens System Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%