2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2022.07.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting single-phase solid solutions in as-sputtered high entropy alloys: High-throughput screening with machine-learning model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their experiments convincingly illustrate that VEC values exceeding 8 promote the formation of FCC phases, while values lower than 6.87 tend to favor BCC phases. These findings have been corroborated by various ML studies, including those conducted by Singh et al 89 and Ren et al 59 . To further scrutinize VEC’s influence across the dataset, we calculated mean VEC values along with standard deviations (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Their experiments convincingly illustrate that VEC values exceeding 8 promote the formation of FCC phases, while values lower than 6.87 tend to favor BCC phases. These findings have been corroborated by various ML studies, including those conducted by Singh et al 89 and Ren et al 59 . To further scrutinize VEC’s influence across the dataset, we calculated mean VEC values along with standard deviations (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Notably, since 2018, many studies have explored the application of ML in predicting phases, encompassing various aspects. Some studies focused on distinguishing whether a SS is a single phase or a non-single phase 30 ; other works delved into classifying SSS vs dual phase (SS+IM) 44 ; SSS vs IM vs AM 45 48 ; SSS vs IM vs dual phase (SS+IM) 49 , 50 ; SSS vs IM vs AM vs dual phase (SS+IM) 37 , 51 – 53 ; SSS vs IM vs AM vs dual phase (SS+AM) 54 ; FCC vs BCC vs dual phase (BCC+FCC) 55 58 ; FCC vs BCC vs dual phase (BCC+FCC) vs IM 59 , 60 ; FCC vs BCC vs HCP vs IM vs others 61 , 62 ; FCC vs BCC vs IM vs AM 63 ; FCC vs BCC vs HCP vs Multiphase 64 . The existing body of literature highlights the significance of predicting whether a SS is a single phase or a mixture of solid solutions with other phases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ML techniques have significantly advanced the establishment of high-throughput screening (HTS) pipelines for discovering a broad spectrum of materials. This progress is evident in the polymer domain, primarily attributed to the evolution of polymer informatics, which has introduced a diverse set of descriptors for numerically characterizing polymers, including fingerprint descriptors, physiochemical descriptors, and graph descriptors. Given the complex nature of polymers, in terms of their structure and composition, continuous efforts are being made to enhance these descriptors to better represent and predict polymer properties. For the purpose of predicting a range of polymer properties, Ramprasad et al developed a hierarchical fingerprint encompassing three distinct scales: atomic, quantitative structure–property relationship, and morphological levels .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%