1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0282(1997)44:3<217::aid-bip3>3.3.co;2-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting sequence‐dependent melting stability of short duplex DNA oligomers

Abstract: Many important applications of DNA sequence-dependent hybridization reactions have recently emerged. This has sparked a renewed interest in analytical calculations of sequence-dependent melting stability of duplex DNA. In particular, for many applications it is often desirable to accurately predict the transition temperature, or tm of short duplex DNA oligomers (approximately 20 base pairs or less) from their sequence and concentration. The thermodynamic analytical method underlying these predictive calculatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
141
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 The duplex thermal stability is also predicted to increase logarithmically with increasing oligo concentration. 8,9 Three states of aggregation were reported for the LUVs (no aggregation, stable aggregates, and continual growth to flocculation) and it is reasonable to assume that these are the analogous states to those we observe for the GUVs, even though different regions of phase space are explored. All LUV experiments were conducted at [Na + ] ) 125 mM, and the DNA coverage from 2.5 to 39 DNA per vesicle corresponds to surface concentrations in the range from 2.5 × 10 -5 to 4.0 × 10 -4 DNA per lipid.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24 The duplex thermal stability is also predicted to increase logarithmically with increasing oligo concentration. 8,9 Three states of aggregation were reported for the LUVs (no aggregation, stable aggregates, and continual growth to flocculation) and it is reasonable to assume that these are the analogous states to those we observe for the GUVs, even though different regions of phase space are explored. All LUV experiments were conducted at [Na + ] ) 125 mM, and the DNA coverage from 2.5 to 39 DNA per vesicle corresponds to surface concentrations in the range from 2.5 × 10 -5 to 4.0 × 10 -4 DNA per lipid.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA binding stability is also affected by other controllable parameters, such as the ionic strength of the solution and the concentration of DNA. 8,9 The prospect exists for having numerous different singlestranded DNA (ssDNA) sequences expressed by different colloid populations to program the assembly of superstructures with high degrees of complexity. 10 A DNA-mediated approach would be an effective solution to the controllable association of different populations of lipid vesicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional thermodynamic models for sequence-dependent DNA melting [79][80][81] were modified to take into account inter-membrane interactions by applying a Bell-type model [82] to account for the tilting of the free energy landscape by an applied force [77]: …”
Section: B Influence Of Membrane Interactions Upon Dna Thermodynamicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These deficiencies are of particular concern because ⌬C P , ⌬V, and ⌬K s provide unique insights into the role of solvent in duplex stabilization (12)(13)(14)(15) and because quantitative knowledge of ⌬C P is required to compare thermodynamic properties of nucleic acids at a common reference temperature (16)(17)(18). This latter capacity is of specific practical value because thermodynamic databases reported at a given temperature often are used to predict hybridization properties at a different temperature as part of various diagnostic and therapeutic protocols (19). Without a significant body of directly measured heat capacity values, this parameter generally has been assumed to be zero for the melting of duplex structures to their component single strands (1)(2)(3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%