1987
DOI: 10.1097/00004583-198709000-00024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting School Failure and Assessing Early Intervention with High-Risk Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1
4

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
22
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Is one year sufficient or will the effects be maintained only with a follow-up intervention? Results from school readiness programs targeted for at-risk preschoolers have noted additional gains if children participated in two to three year follow-on interventions [20] and others have noted the need for comprehensive, multi-year interventions [e.g., 281, although other findings have not shown much additional gain beyond the preschool intervention [29]. A fourth area of investigation relates to whether extending the program to include a family component will enhance its effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Is one year sufficient or will the effects be maintained only with a follow-up intervention? Results from school readiness programs targeted for at-risk preschoolers have noted additional gains if children participated in two to three year follow-on interventions [20] and others have noted the need for comprehensive, multi-year interventions [e.g., 281, although other findings have not shown much additional gain beyond the preschool intervention [29]. A fourth area of investigation relates to whether extending the program to include a family component will enhance its effectiveness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excepcionalmente cuando se hicieron análi-sis en dos estudios cuando los niños tenían 8 años - (Horacek et al, 1987;Campbell y Ramey, 1994)-, se incluyó un quinto grupo de comparación (N = 90), que provenía de una población de la escuela local (LPS), obtenida aleatoriamente de las aulas en las cuales habían sido colocados los niños del grupo de intervención, lo cual proporcionó una muestra representativa de los niños contra los cuales los niños de alto riesgo tenían que competir en la escuela pública. Dos estudios se centraron en los efectos del programa sobre los niños desde los 5 a 8 años, edad de educación primaria, en los cuales se recogió información sobre los resultados en inteligencia - (Ramey y Campbell, 1994)-y en materias escolares, como matemáticas y lectura, y fracaso escolar, especialmente repetición de curso (Horacek et al, 1987).…”
Section: Resultados Introducciónunclassified
“…Dos estudios se centraron en los efectos del programa sobre los niños desde los 5 a 8 años, edad de educación primaria, en los cuales se recogió información sobre los resultados en inteligencia - (Ramey y Campbell, 1994)-y en materias escolares, como matemáticas y lectura, y fracaso escolar, especialmente repetición de curso (Horacek et al, 1987).…”
Section: Resultados Introducciónunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, children treated in preschool scored significantly higher than control children on standardized tests of academic achievement in reading and mathematics after 3 years in school, regardless of whether the comparison was based on age-referenced scores from tests individually administered by project staff or on gradereferenced scores from standardized tests group-administered by the schools to second graders (Ramey & Campbell, 1991). There also was a significantly reduced likelihood that children treated in preschool would be retained in grade during the first 3 years (Horacek, Ramey, Campbell, Hoffmann, & Fletcher, 1987). The analyses indicated that preschool treatment, as opposed to school-age treatment, was more strongly associated with these positive outcomes.…”
Section: Abecedarian Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 89%