2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting risks of uncharacteristic wildfires: Application of the risk assessment process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The two primary analytical components are exposure analysis, which explores the predicted scale and spatiotemporal relationships of causative risk factors, and effects analysis, which explores the response of HVRAs to varying levels of the risk factors (Fairbrother & Turnley, 2005). Risk characterization integrates information from exposure analysis and effects analysis to formulate a conclusion about risk.…”
Section: Wildfire Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two primary analytical components are exposure analysis, which explores the predicted scale and spatiotemporal relationships of causative risk factors, and effects analysis, which explores the response of HVRAs to varying levels of the risk factors (Fairbrother & Turnley, 2005). Risk characterization integrates information from exposure analysis and effects analysis to formulate a conclusion about risk.…”
Section: Wildfire Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimating resource response to wildfire is a crucial step for quantitative risk assessment (Fairbrother & Turnley, 2005), and yet is also one of the most challenging steps. Effects analysis is made difficult by the scientific uncertainty and lack of data/information surrounding wildfire effects on non-market resources; specifically in that limited scientific understanding challenges characterization of marginal ecological changes, and further in that economic methods are immature for broad scale monetization of such changes Venn & Calkin, 2011).…”
Section: Fire Effects Analysis and Incorporation Of Expert Judgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hazard and risk assessment are increasingly part of urban and regional planning policies, with spatial analysis, frequently supported by remote sensing data, serving to assess the probability of loss in a given area and for given time periods due to environmental hazards. In particular, policies designed to limit losses due to floods or wildfires are employed and aided by RS data [38,39]. Remote sensing has also become a critical tool for hazard types that are more difficult to assess, such as seismic hazards.…”
Section: Disaster Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These steps are often referred to as exposure analysis and effects analysis, respectively (Fairbrother and Turnley 2005). In our formulation, the components required to generate wildfire risk estimates are burn probability maps generated from wildfire simulation models, spatially identified resources, and response functions describing the impact of fire on the resource(s) in question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%