Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3091478.3091490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Rising Follower Counts on Twitter Using Profile Information

Abstract: When evaluating the cause of one's popularity on Twitter, one thing is considered to be the main driver: Many tweets. There is debate about the kind of tweet one should publish, but little beyond tweets. Of particular interest is the information provided by each Twitter user's profile page. One of the features are the given names on those profiles. Studies on psychology and economics identified correlations of the first name to, e.g., one's school marks or chances of getting a job interview in the US. Therefor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the study by Mueller and Stumme (2017), the results of our research show that the account with the highest number of followers is not the one with the highest number of tweets and retweets, partly coinciding with the findings of Fernández-Muñoz and García-Guardia (2016) on the dissassociation between interactivity and number of followers. Nevertheless, the tendency of teenagers and young adults to click on Like instead of posting comments (Edelmann, 2017;Bossen;Kottasz, 2020) might explain our findings that retweets are not associated with more popularity, as suggested by Wallner, Kirigslein and Drachen (2019), and Jain and Sinha (2020) It can also be observed that teenagers and young people (the main targets of the accounts studied) set clearly defined trends, as the activity generated by one of the influencers studied (@IbaiLlanos) is exponentially greater than the rest.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to the study by Mueller and Stumme (2017), the results of our research show that the account with the highest number of followers is not the one with the highest number of tweets and retweets, partly coinciding with the findings of Fernández-Muñoz and García-Guardia (2016) on the dissassociation between interactivity and number of followers. Nevertheless, the tendency of teenagers and young adults to click on Like instead of posting comments (Edelmann, 2017;Bossen;Kottasz, 2020) might explain our findings that retweets are not associated with more popularity, as suggested by Wallner, Kirigslein and Drachen (2019), and Jain and Sinha (2020) It can also be observed that teenagers and young people (the main targets of the accounts studied) set clearly defined trends, as the activity generated by one of the influencers studied (@IbaiLlanos) is exponentially greater than the rest.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…We believe that these low registers are not a mere coincidence. Instead, we consider this to be a strategy of the figures under study, the purpose of which is to engage a larger number of followers by expressing their opinions (Mueller;Stumme, 2017). Similarly, the connection or relation between the user and the content, described in the concept of parasocial interaction (Stever; Lawson, 2013; Dibble; Hartmann; Rosaen, 2015; Kim; Song, 2016, among others), can lead to responses that mimic the influencer's comments (Sailunaz;Alhajj, 2019).…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We studied virality's impact(s) on behavioral changes. We focused on behaviors related to building scholarly reputation as identified by prior research: tweeting frequency, sentiment, objectivity, and engaging professionally with other scholars (i.e., posting tweets that are aligned with the posters area of expertise) (Mueller and Stumme 2017;Schnitzler et al 2016). We also examined if viral users, after the first virality, posted tweets that were more similar to the viral tweet, presumably, as a way to re-create the cascading phenomenon, and if they tweeted on more (or less) diverse topics after the viral events, than before.…”
Section: Behavioral Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the authors in [122] propose a machine learning methodology for investigating the impact of profile information towards the increase of Twitter accounts' popularity, in terms of their followers' count. Based on the assumption that given names and English words affect the discoverability, profiles were analyzed and categorized into three groups according to the lexical content of the accounts' name: i) having a first name, ii) containing English words, or iii) neither of both.…”
Section: Metrics Based On Machine-learning Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%