The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1177/1179554920976366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Responses to Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lymphoma: Are We Up to the Standards of Solid Tumors?

Abstract: Treatment of cancer has transformed with the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors. However, the majority of solid tumor patients do not respond to checkpoint blockade. In contrast, the response rate to programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is 65% to 84% which is the highest among all cancers. Currently, checkpoint inhibitors are only approved for cHL and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma as the responses to single-agent checkpoint blockade in other h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Factors include immunogenic neoantigen generation, immunoselection favoring antigenic mutant proteins, and the tumor microenvironment affecting T-cell infiltration and activation. TMB’s relation to PD-1/PD-L1 ICB response in hematological malignancies is evolving ( 10 , 26 ). The median TMB in hematological malignancies is approximately 1.7 mut/Mb, with lymphoma TMB varying due to multiple factors ( 10 , 26 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Factors include immunogenic neoantigen generation, immunoselection favoring antigenic mutant proteins, and the tumor microenvironment affecting T-cell infiltration and activation. TMB’s relation to PD-1/PD-L1 ICB response in hematological malignancies is evolving ( 10 , 26 ). The median TMB in hematological malignancies is approximately 1.7 mut/Mb, with lymphoma TMB varying due to multiple factors ( 10 , 26 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TMB’s relation to PD-1/PD-L1 ICB response in hematological malignancies is evolving ( 10 , 26 ). The median TMB in hematological malignancies is approximately 1.7 mut/Mb, with lymphoma TMB varying due to multiple factors ( 10 , 26 ). In FL, Chalmers et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several cancer types, notably those with MSI, can benefit from the use of TMB as a promising biomarker for predicting the susceptibility to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. [30,34] The potential relationship between the NT5E expression and TMB/MSI in different cancers was assessed in this study. These findings suggest that NT5E may serve as a novel target for cancer immunotherapy in cancers like GBM, ESCA, SARC, PAAD, UCEC, THYM, and COAD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have aimed to assess predictors of ICI efficacy and toxicity in patients with ML [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. In contrast, most studies have sought to identify factors associated with the clinical efficacy and/or toxicity of CAR T cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%