2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/qrs-c51114.2020.00057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Remaining Useful Life with Uncertainty Using Recurrent Neural Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al [36] proposed a novel Bayesian Deep Learning (BDL)based framework to capture the combined effects of aleatoric uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty in RUL forecasting and adopted a sequential Bayesian boosting algorithm to unify the state transition and observation information through a single BDL model; a good RUL probability distribution prediction effect is finally achieved. Gao et al [37] obtained a series of RUL prediction values through RNN, assuming that RUL satisfies the Gaussian distribution, and used a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) to obtain the probability of different RUL. Li et al [38] adopted a Just-in-time Learning (JITL) scheme to deal with the randomness of fault evolution and the diversity of degradation patterns.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [36] proposed a novel Bayesian Deep Learning (BDL)based framework to capture the combined effects of aleatoric uncertainty and epistemic uncertainty in RUL forecasting and adopted a sequential Bayesian boosting algorithm to unify the state transition and observation information through a single BDL model; a good RUL probability distribution prediction effect is finally achieved. Gao et al [37] obtained a series of RUL prediction values through RNN, assuming that RUL satisfies the Gaussian distribution, and used a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) to obtain the probability of different RUL. Li et al [38] adopted a Just-in-time Learning (JITL) scheme to deal with the randomness of fault evolution and the diversity of degradation patterns.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, several attempts have been conducted in the literature to predict the RUL of a turbofan engine. However, these attempts still suffer from the disadvantages of high computational power [13], uncertainty prediction [21,22], and further architecture optimization is required [23] in order to provide high prediction accuracy because even a little uncertainty in prognostics prediction can result in huge losses [24]. Thus, there is a need for accurately predicting the RUL in practical aerospace applications [13] due to the presence of various uncertainties that affect prognostic calculations that, in turn, render turbofan engine RUL predictions uncertain [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there is a need for accurately predicting the RUL in practical aerospace applications [13] due to the presence of various uncertainties that affect prognostic calculations that, in turn, render turbofan engine RUL predictions uncertain [25]. Previous investigations [1,6,13,14,21,22,24] do not attempt to quantify the inherent uncertainty in their predictions. Hence, the research gaps identified by [25] still remain open in the context of RUL prediction in prognostics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation