2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women under 25 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prediction of cervical lesion regression or persistence was modest in terms of sensitivity and overall accuracy, even though it included factors associated with regression or persistence of cervical lesions [ 31 , 32 ], thus leaving treatment algorithms dependent on repeated examinations and testing. Moreover, these results indicate the need for inclusion of more sensitive tests, which can outperform the classical approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction of cervical lesion regression or persistence was modest in terms of sensitivity and overall accuracy, even though it included factors associated with regression or persistence of cervical lesions [ 31 , 32 ], thus leaving treatment algorithms dependent on repeated examinations and testing. Moreover, these results indicate the need for inclusion of more sensitive tests, which can outperform the classical approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In women with CIN2, others have reported that disease regresses in 50% of cases within two years [ 24 ]. In the patient cohort studied here, disease in at least 53% of the women under 25 with CIN2 spontaneously regressed [ 25 ]. Importantly, progression was more likely in HPV16/18 infection than with other hr HPV types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though endocervical margin involvement has been found to be a risk factor for treatment failure, an observational cohort study by Ang C. et al discovered that the recurrence rate in a subgroup of women ≤ 35 years of age was similar in specimens of < 10 mm versus ≥ 10 mm length despite a higher rate of involved endocervical margins when excising < 10 mm [ 32 ]. Therefore, a possible approach in women with a wish to conceive could be to offer an excision length below 10 mm regardless of TZ, with a mandatory HPV test conducted 6 months after LLETZ, specifically considering that post-treatment HPV testing is known to have a higher sensitivity to predict residual or recurrent disease than margin status (91.0% versus 55.8%) [ 19 , 33 ]. It is noteworthy that in women with suspected invasive and/or glandular disease, this approach cannot be advised generally given the indisputable importance for oncological safety in those particular cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%