2008
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting proteolytic sites in extracellular proteins: only halfway there

Abstract: The results revealed that only half of the extracellular proteolytic sites are currently annotated, leaving over 3600 unannotated ones. Furthermore, we have found that only 6% of the unannotated sites are similar to known proteolytic sites, whereas the remaining 94% do not share significant similarity with any annotated proteolytic site. The computational challenges in these two cases are very different. While the precision in detecting the former group is close to perfect, only a mere 22% of the latter group … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(The full cleavage prediction concept is detailed in Kliger et al (15).) The predicted signal peptide was removed, and potential cleavage sites were scored based on the outcome of the machine learning algorithm used for cleavage site prediction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(The full cleavage prediction concept is detailed in Kliger et al (15).) The predicted signal peptide was removed, and potential cleavage sites were scored based on the outcome of the machine learning algorithm used for cleavage site prediction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A peptide database was created using a cleavage‐predicting algorithm 13 on all the NCBI nonredundant (nr) (proteome in Fig. 1A) potentially secreted proteins (human proteins with a signal peptide prediction) and Swiss‐Prot/Uniprot signal peptide annotated proteins.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was achieved using a computational biology discovery platform, which we developed recently, that uses machine learning algorithms designed to predict novel G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) peptide ligands cleaved from secreted proteins (extracted from the Swiss-Prot protein database) by convertase proteolysis, as described previously. 12,13 The ligands identified might, therefore, exist endogenously because of naturally occurring proteolysis. The predicted peptide ligands were synthesized and screened for activation of 152 GPCRs by calcium flux and cAMP assays.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%