2009 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems 2009
DOI: 10.1109/cisis.2009.194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Protein Subcellular Localizations for Gram-Negative Bacteria Using DP-PSSM and Support Vector Machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For physicochemical property-based features, AAINDEX features outperformed EBGW features across all the three species in terms of ACC, F-value, MCC and AUC value. Surprisingly, the PSSM-based features showed poor performance, indicating a limited contribution to the prediction and a somewhat contrasting observation different from previous prediction studies of other protein attributes for which PSSM-based features are often considered essential [28,36,41,42,[68][69][70][71][72]. A possible reason might be that part of the PSSM matrix used for describing the segment is far less informative than the complete PSSM matrix generated from full-length protein sequences in previous studies, thus making PSSM-based features unable to extract enough useful patterns and characteristics.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Different Feature Encoding Schemescontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…For physicochemical property-based features, AAINDEX features outperformed EBGW features across all the three species in terms of ACC, F-value, MCC and AUC value. Surprisingly, the PSSM-based features showed poor performance, indicating a limited contribution to the prediction and a somewhat contrasting observation different from previous prediction studies of other protein attributes for which PSSM-based features are often considered essential [28,36,41,42,[68][69][70][71][72]. A possible reason might be that part of the PSSM matrix used for describing the segment is far less informative than the complete PSSM matrix generated from full-length protein sequences in previous studies, thus making PSSM-based features unable to extract enough useful patterns and characteristics.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Different Feature Encoding Schemescontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…(v) Pse-PSSM (Chou and Shen, 2007 ) is similar to PseAAC and encodes the PSSM of proteins with different lengths using a uniform length matrix. (iv) DP-PSSM (Juan et al, 2009 ), a protein descriptor based on similarity, gets the hidden sequential order information and can avoid cancellation of positive or negative terms in the average process. As a result, we obtained a 400-dimensional vector for each sequence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictor trained by the training set without and with SMOTE both achieved promising results, especially the latter, as evaluated by an independent test set. SMOTE improved the performance of all majority feature encodings, except Directional Property-PSSM (DP_PSSM) [104]. The comparison is shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Smote Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%