2017
DOI: 10.1109/tcbb.2016.2616469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting Protein-DNA Binding Residues by Weightedly Combining Sequence-Based Features and Boosting Multiple SVMs

Abstract: Protein-DNA interactions are ubiquitous in a wide variety of biological processes. Correctly locating DNA-binding residues solely from protein sequences is an important but challenging task for protein function annotations and drug discovery, especially in the post-genomic era where large volumes of protein sequences have quickly accumulated. In this study, we report a new predictor, named TargetDNA, for targeting protein-DNA binding residues from primary sequences. TargetDNA uses a protein's evolutionary info… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PDNA-543 and PDNA-41 are independent test datasets that have been constructed by Hu et al [ 13 ]. They collect a dataset that contains DNA-binding protein chains and has clear target annotations in PDB (Protein Data Bank) [ 55 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…PDNA-543 and PDNA-41 are independent test datasets that have been constructed by Hu et al [ 13 ]. They collect a dataset that contains DNA-binding protein chains and has clear target annotations in PDB (Protein Data Bank) [ 55 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concomitant information of sequence-based tactics [ 1 , 2 ] usually comprises physical and chemical properties of amino acids, evolutionary and other sequence information, such as BindN [ 3 ], BindN Random Forest (BindN-RF) [ 4 ], BindN+ [ 5 ], DNABindR [ 6 ], DNA Binding Sites Prediction (DBS-PRED) [ 7 ], DNA Binding Sites based on Position Specific Scoring Matrix (DBS-PSSM) [ 8 ], ProteDNA [ 9 ], DNA Protein-Binding (DP-Bind) [ 10 ], DNA Interaction Sites Identified from Sequence (DISIS) [ 11 ], Meta DNA Binding Site (MetaDBSite) [ 12 ], TargetDNA [ 13 ], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to having the same features, the results in Table 9 also show the running time comparison of SMOTE + XGBoost and RUS + ensemble classifiers, which means that two schemes for the class imbalance problem. Different from the previous protein-DNA binding site dataset, PDNA-543 (9549 binding residues and 134,995 non-binding residues) and PDNA-41 (734 binding residues and 14,021 non-binding residues) are datasets constructed by Hu et al [61]. SXGBsite constructed the prediction model by the PDNA-543 training set, obtained prediction results on the PDNA-41 independent test set, and the comparison of SXGBsite with BindN [37], ProteDNA [62], BindN+ [63], MetaDBSite [32], DP-Bind [39], DNABind [64], TargetDNA [61], and EC-RUS(DNA) [44] is provided in Table 10.…”
Section: Running Time Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I. PENDAHULUAN Pengolahan data Dioxyribo Nucleic Acid (DNA) untuk mencari suatu pola dalam sequence sudah sering dilakukan [1]- [3]. Tujuan dari pencarian pola ini beragam, ada yang dipakai sebagai forensik, mutasi genetik, atau adanya suatu penyakit di dalam suatu DNA.…”
unclassified