Predicting problematic alcohol use with the DSM–5 alternative model of personality pathology.

Creswell, Kasey G.; Bachrach, Rachel L.; Wright, Aidan G.C.; Pinto, Anthony; Ansell, Emily B.

doi:10.1037/per0000131

Cited by 49 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 68 publications

(106 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Creswell, Bachrach, Wright, Pinto, and Ansell (2016) Roche (in press) conducted a 14-day electronic diary study, assessing both daily levels of Criterion A and B along with daily levels of personality dysfunction across several domains in a sample of 175 college students. The shared variance was substantial, but Criterion A and B both evidenced a degree of incremental validity in accounting for different aspects of dysfunction.…”

Section: )mentioning

confidence: 99%

Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP

Widiger

Bach

Chmielewski

et al. 2018

Journal of Personality Assessment

Self Cite

120

111

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The categorical model of personality disorder classification in the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed. [DSM-5]; American Psychiatric Association, 2013 ) is highly and fundamentally problematic. Proposed for DSM-5 and provided within Section III (for Emerging Measures and Models) was the Alternative Model of Personality Disorder (AMPD) classification, consisting of Criterion A (self-interpersonal deficits) and Criterion B (maladaptive personality traits). A proposed alternative to the DSM-5 more generally is an empirically based dimensional organization of psychopathology identified as the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP; Kotov et al., 2017 ). HiTOP currently includes, at the highest level, a general factor of psychopathology. Further down are the five domains of detachment, antagonistic externalizing, disinhibited externalizing, thought disorder, and internalizing (along with a provisional sixth somatoform dimension) that align with Criterion B. The purpose of this article is to discuss the potential inclusion and placement of the self-interpersonal deficits of the DSM-5 Section III Criterion A within HiTOP.

show abstract

Section: )mentioning

confidence: 99%

Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP

Widiger

Bach

Chmielewski

et al. 2018

Journal of Personality Assessment

Self Cite

120

111

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The association between Antagonism, Disinhibition, and problematic alcohol use has also been investigated in adulthood Creswell, Bachrach, Wright, Pinto and Ansell (2016) observed that Disinhibition was a stronger predictor of problematic alcohol use among younger individuals, while Antagonism was a stronger predictor among older people. Disinhibition was also strongly related to continuing to gamble in the attempt to recuperate losses ( chasing ) among adult habitual gamblers (Nigro, Ciccarelli & Cosenza, 2018).…”

Section: Maladaptive Personality Functioningmentioning

confidence: 99%

The relationship between maladaptive personality functioning and problematic technology use in adolescence: A cluster analysis approach

Amendola

Spensieri

Biuso

et al. 2020

Scandinavian J Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last two decades, scientific research has explored the problematic use of internet, videogames and mobile phones. However, there is still little consistent knowledge regarding the co-occurrence of problematic technology use and the role of maladaptive personality characteristics in adolescence. The present study aimed to investigate adolescents' styles of technology use with a cluster analysis approach focusing on personality functioning. The sample comprised 408 Italian adolescents (46.3% males) aged 11 to 18 years (M age = 13.80; SD = 2.08). Data were collected using the Internet Addiction Test, the Videogame Dependency Scale, the Test of Mobile-Phone Dependence Brief Form and the Personality Inventory for DSM5 Brief Form. Results provided a four-cluster solution based on the co-occurrence of problematic technology use. The four clusters were labeled as follows: cluster 1: "Above average internet and mobile-phone use"; cluster 2: "Below average technology use"; cluster 3: "Above average videogame use"; and cluster 4: "Problematic technology use." Analyses on demographic variables (e.g., gender and age) demonstrated significant differences between the four groups. Adolescents with high levels of problematic technology use reported greater overall personality dysfunction than the other three groups. This finding supported our hypothesis on maladaptive personality functioning in adolescents at risk for addiction. Finally, the Antagonism domain played a specific role in differentiating the severity of adolescents' involvement in technology use. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and to plan preventive interventions as well as therapeutic treatments.

show abstract

“…The structure of the DSM-5 trait model was initially developed based on factor analyses of responses to PID-5 items in large representative population samples. Therefore, it is not surprising that the structure replicates in samples of undergraduates (Wright, Thomas, et al, 2012), US community samples (Creswell, Bachrach, Wright, Pinto, & Ansell, in press), European samples (Zimmermann, Altenstein, et al, 2014), informant reports (Markon, Quilty, Bagby, & Krueger, 2013), and clinician reports (Morey et al, 2013). …”

Section: Development Description and Conceptual-empirical Originsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychological assessment with the DSM–5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: Tradition and innovation.

Waugh¹,

Hopwood²,

Krueger³

et al. 2017

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Self Cite

143

129

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Section III Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD; APA, 2013) represents an innovative system for simultaneous psychiatric classification and psychological assessment of personality disorders (PD). The AMPD combines major paradigms of personality assessment and provides an original, heuristic, flexible, and practical framework that enriches clinical thinking and practice. Origins, emerging research, and clinical application of the AMPD for diagnosis and psychological assessment are reviewed. The AMPD integrates assessment and research traditions, facilitates case conceptualization, is easy to learn and use, and assists in providing patient feedback. New as well as existing tests and psychometric methods may be used to operationalize the AMPD for clinical assessments.

show abstract

Predicting problematic alcohol use with the DSM–5 alternative model of personality pathology.

Cited by 49 publications

References 68 publications

Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP

Criterion A of the AMPD in HiTOP

The relationship between maladaptive personality functioning and problematic technology use in adolescence: A cluster analysis approach

Psychological assessment with the DSM–5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: Tradition and innovation.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About