2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2008.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting porosity reduction due to silica diagenesis using seismic reflection data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By changing the input parameters, these porosity‐depth functions can be adapted to describe the diagenetic porosity reductions offshore Norway (e.g. Meadows & Davies, ), Japan (e.g. Tada & Iijima, ) and California (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By changing the input parameters, these porosity‐depth functions can be adapted to describe the diagenetic porosity reductions offshore Norway (e.g. Meadows & Davies, ), Japan (e.g. Tada & Iijima, ) and California (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polygonal faults are thought to form during early burial and diagenesis as a consequence of heterogeneous lateral volume changes caused by or associated to laterally-heterogeneous mechanisms and parameters such as sediment compaction, fluid flow and pressure, gravitational loading, and chemically driven volumetric contraction or syneresis (Cartwright, 1994a(Cartwright, , 2011Cartwright and Lonergan, 1996;Cosgrove, 1998;Dewhurst et al, 1999;Watterson et al, 2000;Goulty, 2001Goulty, , 2008Gay et al, 2004;Dehandschutter et al, 2005;Goulty and Swarbrick, 2005;Victor and Moretti, 2006;Gay and Berndt, 2007;Davies et al, 2009;Meadows and Davies, 2009;Alves, 2010;Ireland et al, 2010;Davies and Ireland, 2011). Despite numerous studies, the origin of these faults remains still largely controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, 5a & 6a) (Berndt et al, 2004;Hansen et al, 2005;Davies et al, 2009;Neagu et al, 2010;Ireland et al, 2011). This conversion induced a porosity reduction of 25% (Meadows and Davies, 2009) by dissolution-precipitation processes and resulted in an increase of bulk density from 1.3 to 1.55 g/cm3 (well data from Fig. 2), thus representing a change in mechanical properties of the hosting sediments (Nobes et al, 1992;Guerin and Goldberg, 1996).…”
Section: Coherency Intervalsmentioning
confidence: 61%