2003
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/14.2.257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting polygynous settlement while incorporating varying female competitive strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(113 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smith and Sandell 2005;Ferretti and Winkler 2009;Grønstøl et al 2003), such females do not lose much in terms of their fitness within the studied population. Double-brooded females have a clear advantage in terms of local recruitment over all other females, but secondary females do not differ from other females (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Smith and Sandell 2005;Ferretti and Winkler 2009;Grønstøl et al 2003), such females do not lose much in terms of their fitness within the studied population. Double-brooded females have a clear advantage in terms of local recruitment over all other females, but secondary females do not differ from other females (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A lower reproductive success of secondary females might be either the result of poorer quality females in secondary broods (see Grønstøl et al 2003) or the consequence of costs of sharing a male (e.g. Slagsvold & Lifjeld 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important limitation may be that we assume all individuals in a specific social role to be identical. For example, variation in the competitive ability of females may alter predictions of the polygyny threshold model, because there will be a correlation between the quality of already mated females and the settlement date of secondary females (Grønstøl et al, 2003). For example, early breeding females may be of higher quality and therefore better able at defending their mating status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%