2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.4.113609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting plasticity in disordered solids from structural indicators

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
153
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
4
153
1
Order By: Relevance
“…accuracy for faster cooling rate was observed before 22,35,38,52 , as the critical structural difference becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish 38 . The more relaxed glasses, on the other hand, have a much smaller population of fertile sites that exhibit larger shear susceptibility, making the recognition easier and prediction more robust.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…accuracy for faster cooling rate was observed before 22,35,38,52 , as the critical structural difference becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish 38 . The more relaxed glasses, on the other hand, have a much smaller population of fertile sites that exhibit larger shear susceptibility, making the recognition easier and prediction more robust.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, it remains difficult to predict which particles will be associated to the cores. Devising a more general, unsupervised approach to identify structural defects is crucial to predict plastic events in glasses under shear [63] and also dynamic heterogeneities in supercooled liquids [58,61,64].…”
Section: Local Structure Of Unstable and Stable Coresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They look commonly decorrelated from the local values of the residual stresses (Figure 2). However, they play a more important role on the relaxation processes and irreversible motion in glasses [14,[44][45][46][47]. Incremental stresses are indeed related to local elastic moduli in Hooke's description of elasticity, and thus to the Hessian matrix (second order derivative) of the Hamiltonian, or indirectly to the dynamical matrix of the system used to determine the instability thresholds at a microscopic level [48].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the signature of plasticity is not always visible neither in the structure factor, due to the fact that, in amorphous materials, the related structural changes if any are far from being homogeneously distributed, and also because plasticity in amorphous samples does not always induce easily recognizable structural changes [6]. In this context, numerical simulations at the atomic scale [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] combined with theories based on the existence of localized plastic rearrangements identified by their residual strains [15,16] have allowed building in the last thirty years a theoretical picture of plasticity in amorphous materials without referencing to structurally visible defects such as dislocations. The precise signature of plasticity is however strongly dependent on the composition of the glass, that is on the nature of the bonding (degree of covalency for example [6]), on the atomic composition [17,18], as well as on its thermo-mechanical history [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%