Predicting physical activity change in cancer survivors: an application of the Health Action Process Approach

Hardcastle, Sarah J.; Maxwell-Smith, Chloé; Hagger, Martin S.

doi:10.1007/s11764-021-01107-6

Cited by 13 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1 ). Two studies reported on different wearable device data about one patient population from Australia, 73 , 74 another 2 from the US in the late 2000s 150 , 151 and mid 2010s, 154 , 155 and another 2 from Canada 183 , 184 ; in total, 17 805 unique patients were reported across 195 unique datasets. There was a low risk of bias observed in the reported studies (>75%) ( Supplementary Fig.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Use of Wearable Devices in Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review

Chow,

Drkulec,

et al. 2023

The Oncologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the current literature on wearable technologies in oncology patients for the purpose of prognostication, treatment monitoring, and rehabilitation planning. Methods A search was conducted in Medline ALL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science, up until February 2022. Articles were included if they reported on consumer grade and/or non-commercial wearable devices in the setting of either prognostication, treatment monitoring or rehabilitation. Results We found 199 studies reporting on 18 513 patients suitable for inclusion. One hundred and eleven studies used wearable device data primarily for the purposes of rehabilitation, 68 for treatment monitoring, and 20 for prognostication. The most commonly-reported brands of wearable devices were ActiGraph (71 studies; 36%), Fitbit (37 studies; 19%), Garmin (13 studies; 7%), and ActivPAL (11 studies; 6%). Daily minutes of physical activity were measured in 121 studies (61%), and daily step counts were measured in 93 studies (47%). Adherence was reported in 86 studies, and ranged from 40% to 100%; of these, 63 (74%) reported adherence in excess of 80%. Conclusion Wearable devices may provide valuable data for the purposes of treatment monitoring, prognostication, and rehabilitation. Future studies should investigate live-time monitoring of collected data, which may facilitate directed interventions.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Use of Wearable Devices in Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review

Chow,

Drkulec,

et al. 2023

The Oncologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As an additional note, the increasing interest in the Health Action Process Approach-related constructs such as social support may reveal an attempt from researchers to understand and document behavior maintenance processes. Indeed, past research has noted the importance of the Health Action Process Approach model for the understanding of PA behavior [142][143][144].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychosocial correlates of physical activity in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Rodrigues,

Encantado,

Franco

et al. 2024

J Cancer Surviv

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Physical activity (PA) is a non-pharmacological approach to optimize health benefits in cancer survivors and is recommended as part of care. However, most cancer survivors fail to meet PA recommendations. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify psychosocial correlates of free-living PA in cancer survivors. Methods Three electronic databases were searched (PubMed, PsycINFO, and SportDiscus). Meta-analyses were conducted for psychosocial correlates tested ≥ 3 times. Results Sixty-four articles were included. Eighty-eight different free-living PA correlates were identified. Meta-analyses (n = 32 studies) tested 23 PA correlates, of which 16 were significant (p < 0.05). Larger effect sizes (0.30 < ES > 0.45) were found for exercise self-efficacy, perceived behavioral control, intention, lower perceived barriers for exercise, enjoyment, perceived PA benefits, and attitudes. Small-to-moderate effects (0.18 < ES < 0.22) were found for subjective norms, physical functioning, quality of life, depression, and mental health. These findings were generally in line with narrative results. Conclusions This systematic review highlights important psychosocial correlates of free-living PA that can be targeted in future PA promotion interventions for cancer survivors. Constructs mainly from SCT and TPB were the most studied and appear to be associated with free-living PA in this population. However, we cannot currently assert which frameworks might be more effective. Further studies of better methodological quality, per correlate and theory, exploring longer-term associations and across different types of cancer, are needed. Implications for Cancer Survivors Having higher exercise self-efficacy, perceived behavioral control, intention, enjoyment and perceived PA benefits, more positive attitudes towards PA, and lower perceived barriers for exercise, can help increase PA in cancer survivors.

show abstract

“…The majority of the 71 quantitative studies were conducted in the USA (n = 38, 53.5%) . The other studies were conducted in Canada [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71], Australia [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79], Germany [80][81][82], the Netherlands [83,84], the UK [85,86], Portugal [87], New Zealand [88], Sweden [89], Spain [90], Norway [91], the UK [85,92], Denmark [93], Taiwan [94,95], South Korea [96], Puerto Rico [38], and China [44]. The number of participants in these studies ranged from 23 [40] to 3000 [61].…”

Section: General Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…15 out of 71 studies (i.e., 21.1%) had a cross-sectional study design and assessed changes in lifestyle behaviors following diagnosis and/or treatment retrospectively [26,31,32,62,67,73,76,78,79,83,[89][90][91][92]96]. 38 out of 71 studies (i.e., 53.5%) were intervention studies [27,28,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][45][46][47][48]50,51,[53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][68][69][70]74,75,77,81,82,…”

Section: General Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…39 quantitative studies assessed intra-individual determinants of change in physical activity [26,27,[29][30][31][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][64][65][66][67][68][69][72][73][74][75][76][77]82,83,[86][87][88][89]94,96]. 16 studies assessed self-efficacy as potential determinant of changes in physical activity [27,30,[33][34][35][37][38][39][40]45,…”

Section: Intra-individual Determinantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychosocial Determinants of Lifestyle Change after a Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Hoedjes

Nijman

Hinnen

2022

Cancers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to provide a systematic overview of the scientific literature on sociodemographic, psychological and social determinants that may facilitate or hamper lifestyle change after the diagnosis cancer. Four databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Web of Science) were searched for relevant papers up to October 2021. Of the 9586 references yielded by the literature search, 123 papers were included: 71 quantitative and 52 qualitative papers. Findings showed a large variety of determinants influencing lifestyle change after cancer diagnosis, with differences between lifestyle behaviors (physical activity, diet, smoking, alcohol, sun protection, and multiple lifestyle behaviors) and findings from quantitative vs. qualitative studies. Findings demonstrate the important role of oncology healthcare professionals in promoting healthy lifestyle changes in cancer survivors. In addition, findings inform researchers involved in the development of health promotion programs about the methods and strategies they can use to promote healthy lifestyle changes in cancer survivors. Favorable lifestyle changes are expected to have beneficial effects on cancer risk and overall health in cancer survivors.

show abstract

Predicting physical activity change in cancer survivors: an application of the Health Action Process Approach

Cited by 13 publications

References 41 publications

The Use of Wearable Devices in Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review

The Use of Wearable Devices in Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review

Psychosocial correlates of physical activity in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Psychosocial Determinants of Lifestyle Change after a Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About