2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Predicting personal exposure of Windsor, Ontario residents to volatile organic compounds using indoor measurements and survey data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
18
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
18
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Acetaldehyde levels in Regina were lower than what was measured in other studies, where average concentrations ranged from 18.1 to 39.6 μg/m 3 [6,22,24,25]. Acetaldehyde in our models was strongly associated with several ventilation parameters, as well as with cooking with oil and cigarette smoke (winter models only).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Acetaldehyde levels in Regina were lower than what was measured in other studies, where average concentrations ranged from 18.1 to 39.6 μg/m 3 [6,22,24,25]. Acetaldehyde in our models was strongly associated with several ventilation parameters, as well as with cooking with oil and cigarette smoke (winter models only).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…14 Several studies that have included personal, indoor, and outdoor pollutant measurements have found that personal exposures can exceed indoor and outdoor concentrations. [15][16][17][18] These findings suggest that not all personal exposures are captured by residential indoor and outdoor measurements. In the case of particulate air pollution, simple movement by residents in the home can resuspend particles from clothes or carpeting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In another southeast Michigan study, but in the more suburban and affluent communities of Ann Arbor and Ypsilanti, ACRs were lower, averaging 0.43 ± 0.37 h −1 (n = 15) [33]. Homes in nearby Windsor, Ontario, Canada were also “tighter” than the Detroit homes, with a geometric mean ACR in winter of 0.32 h −1 (95th percentile confidence interval [CI]: 0.26 to 0.40 h −1 ; n = 32), and only 0.19 h −1 (CI: 0.15 to 0.24 h −1 ; n = 42) in summer [34]. In the Relationship among Indoor Outdoor and Personal Air (RIOPA) study, which measured approximately 100 residences each in Elizabeth, NJ, Houston, TX and Los Angeles, CA, the median ACR was 0.71 h −1 (n = 506), and ACRs differed by city (0.87, 0.88 and 0.47 h −1 , respectively), as well as by season [35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACRs typically increase in winter in regions with heating needs (like Michigan and Canada) due to greater indoor/outdoor temperature differences and higher wind speeds, and the stack effect (due to temperature differences) is enhanced in multistory buildings [1,11,34]. In summer and in warm climates, air conditioner use can lower ACRs, as seen in Houston, while in moderate climates or when temperatures are mild, natural (and sometimes mechanical) ventilation promoted by opened windows and doors increases ACRs [9,35,41].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%